If we used the same principle proposed by Chissitt the Police should ignore all historical offences that occurred over one year ago. The question is if they held a party did it break the law applicable at the time, who it is doesn’t matter. The last time I checked the Police are in place to uphold the law of the land just like they did with great veracity during the lockdown or is this alright in the blue tinted spectacles worn but denied by Chissitt.
Do we know for sure an offence has been committed, or once again are you that desperate to dig some dirt up on this the government you'll use that rag the sun who don't seem to care who they try and cause bother to sell their rubbish even though they haven't provided any proof, once again innuendos and mis information how sad an individual you are when you have to accuse the police's integrity to shower your bitterness upon us. One things for sure squire it does seem to feel like I'm wearing blue tinted specs trying to educate you and your sorry misgivings regarding the elected government of the day
Listen squire it does not matter if they are the government or someone sat in their garden they are not above the law even though de Pfeffel and his party believe they are. To find out if the law was broken squire the Police will need to investigate or do we now accept the word of de Pfeffel. With regards digging up dirt squire this is not really necessary because this is the government who just keeps on giving.
Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:Listen squire it does not matter if they are the government or someone sat in their garden they are not above the law even though de Pfeffel and his party believe they are. To find out if the law was broken squire the Police will need to investigate or do we now accept the word of de Pfeffel. With regards digging up dirt squire this is not really necessary because this is the government who just keeps on giving.
De Pfeffel this De Pleffel that, is it another attempt at a funny by you squire
Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:If we used the same principle proposed by Chissitt the Police should ignore all historical offences that occurred over one year ago. The question is if they held a party did it break the law applicable at the time, who it is doesn’t matter. The last time I checked the Police are in place to uphold the law of the land just like they did with great veracity during the lockdown or is this alright in the blue tinted spectacles worn but denied by Chissitt.
The police are there to enforce the law, but they are able to use discretion as what effort they will put in to enforcing any particular law at a given time. This approach prevents money and time being wasted. I’m pretty sure I would prefer our police forces to be investigating more serious crimes.
TURFEDOUT wrote:The police are there to enforce the law, but they are able to use discretion as what effort they will put in to enforcing any particular law at a given time. This approach prevents money and time being wasted. I’m pretty sure I would prefer our police forces to be investigating more serious crimes.
Well that’s an unusual way of saying that the tories have underfunded the police , and that’s why crime has soared
TURFEDOUT wrote:The police are there to enforce the law, but they are able to use discretion as what effort they will put in to enforcing any particular law at a given time. This approach prevents money and time being wasted. I’m pretty sure I would prefer our police forces to be investigating more serious crimes.
They were investigating and breaking up parties last December and should likewise investigate if there was anything happening at No. 10 at the same time.
TURFEDOUT wrote:The police are there to enforce the law, but they are able to use discretion as what effort they will put in to enforcing any particular law at a given time. This approach prevents money and time being wasted. I’m pretty sure I would prefer our police forces to be investigating more serious crimes.
They were investigating and breaking up parties last December and should likewise investigate if there was anything happening at No. 10 at the same time.
"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs."
They were investigating and breaking up parties last December and should likewise investigate if there was anything happening at No. 10 at the same time.
Big If, I'm sure if there was any truth in it the Tory haters would have been on to it, 12 month down the line the sun decides we aren't selling enough papers let's dream something up like it isn't something we haven't done before, I can understand Monsieur Pimpernel pursuing this as he's so desperate, but you try to put yourself across as the voice of reason, don't fall into his category.
They were investigating and breaking up parties last December and should likewise investigate if there was anything happening at No. 10 at the same time.
Big If, I'm sure if there was any truth in it the Tory haters would have been on to it, 12 month down the line the sun decides we aren't selling enough papers let's dream something up like it isn't something we haven't done before, I can understand Monsieur Pimpernel pursuing this as he's so desperate, but you try to put yourself across as the voice of reason, don't fall into his category.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 133 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
