jools wrote: I find it hilarious that somehow Toulouse are expected to bring a tv deal- did Leigh? Would Fev? Then the fact that Toulouse are expected to bring to the table half a dozen top class home grown players - what like Fev and Leigh? Did I miss something - or is this just really xenophobia by excuse?
I think your better than that just shouting "xenophobia".
Ian Lenegan in 2015 went to Toulouse as a guest of the club with other SL chairmen. Lenegan was supportive of Toulouse for Superleague and in the main after dinner speech he told them so, but added that TO needed to
"Work towards developing French players capable of playing at SL level and finding a French TV deal".Fev and Leigh would also be expected to have player development systems in Superleague too, albeit as English clubs they would underpin the TV deal anyway.
Eamon McManus was also supportive of Toulouse when he lambasted Toronto Wolfpack. He felt two French clubs would create a classic derby, he felt that would
"open up new avenues with French Broadcasters" This was all at a time when the SKY TV deal was massive.
But that deal has been slashed and the problem will be if there is no French TV deal, and if Toulouse turn up at their first Superleague fixture with only the odd one or two pro French players, then English clubs will be asking Lenegan why has he let them in when they have not met the criteria Lenegan on behalf of Superleague set for them, something
Toulouse did not argue against.
You can try to belittle Featherstone and Leigh as "Village clubs" and extol the virtues of a major city club, but the fact is playing in a big city doesn't guarantee growth - see London Broncos lack of success in our of biggest city, see the success and longevity of leigh and Featherstone based in pit villages.