https://www.rugby-league.com/article/35 ... e-rovers-- Seems quite a light punishment when you read the article of how they effectively lied. Not much of a deterrent as it seems they've just been told to hand over the two points they probably shouldn't have had anyway.

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/35 ... e-rovers-- Seems quite a light punishment when you read the article of how they effectively lied. Not much of a deterrent as it seems they've just been told to hand over the two points they probably shouldn't have had anyway.

It would have been better to dock their win percentage. It seems slightly harsh in my opinion for the RFL to dock them points. A hefty fine and a slap on the wrist would have sufficed for me.

The thing that bothers me about the whole affair is the statement that Featherstone have released in response. It looks like its been written by the same clown that mans their social media platforms. Utter tin pot organisation.

Featherstone's 'Head of Marketing and Media' is Jac Davies. Here is a little bit of info on their media man: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-57344736.amp

Featherstone's 'Head of Marketing and Media' is Jac Davies. Here is a little bit of info on their media man: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-57344736.amp

Don't quite understand the correlation between the RFL's findings and those of the local council, who found them not guilty of any wrongdoing.