Quote jaybs="jaybs"It outdoor have been a crime, if we had not been granted a licence, how many Super League players we have developed. We seem to have got Our Academy rights and good staff looking after it.
Real anger reading in Castleford what they think same with Bradford? and Hull KR.'"
The clubs who have missed out have no-one to blame but themselves. There were 15 applicants for 12 licences, and yet only 10 have been allocated. That suggests the other 5 must have been well below the required standard. Cas rattled off a list of players they've produced, almost all of whom are now over the age of thirty, which isn't the robust argument they think it is.
There are two issues here for the RFL (and sport) to face: 1) a lot of clubs sign a bunch of 15 year olds who have no chance of making pro, simply so they can claim they run an academy. They then put them through a poor academy system and are then released at 18. Those kids never go back to the community clubs they came from, which end up being decimated by losing kids merely to fill squad places in academies that are going nowhere. 2) the truth is that because of the geography of our game every player coming through at Cas, Bradford, HKR would have been picked up from their community clubs by another academy, so we're not going to lose any players by them signing for Huddersfield instead of Bradford, or Wakey instead of Cas.
As usual it has proved howls of outrage on social media, partly because that's the way the world is and partly because the RFL always do a poor job of explaining themselves and their decisions.