DizzyHeights wrote:As I Warrington fan I strongly agree with the posters who have said to get Tony Smith in charge, he turned Warrington into contenders and although he never got us over the line we are now challenging for honours consistently . Hull are a sleeping giant in this game they have everything in place, stadium, support, you’ve even improved your squad to one that could challenge with the right coach. Smith for me would come in and sort out the deadwood and any players who don’t have the right attitude. His style of play is exciting, defence tough your fans would love it I hope you do get him in as the game needs a strong and challenging hull side.

Rubyred1 wrote:I didnt know Tony Smith was unemployed ......Oh he isn't He is the coach of an up and coming strong and challenging side in Hull

DizzyHeights wrote:If we’re being honest he jumps ship in a heartbeat if hull fc come in for him. k.r unfortunately for their supporters will always be super league fodder it’s just in their makeup .

Seventies red wrote:You are seriously deluding yourself. But you keep on dreaming if it keeps you happy.

DizzyHeights wrote:I’m a Warrington fan I don’t care, just speaking the truth . Only thing stopping hull fc from getting up there challenging is a decent coach, there’s plenty stopping hull k.r, poorer players, 3 stands in an awful stadium, fewer supporters, this is just from an outsiders perspective. Hull fc are a big club, rovers unfortunately aren’t.

Riderofthepalehorse wrote:I didn’t understand Josh going to full back, Buchanan perhaps or even Connor with Carlos going in the halves, very strange bench last night, wingers etc, maybe lack of bodies.

bonaire wrote:I dont understand Buchanan been included at all.
He drafts Cam Scott into the 21 who is staying at the club then plays Buchanan ahead of him when he is leaving the club.
We are desperately short of forwards yet Bienek never gets a look in.
Maybe something to do with having to take on his salary if Leigh release him but then why have Scott released when we have plenty of centre/wing cover and then dont play him.
Seems to me Last is way out of his depth here and as you say why all the positional changes when Shaul went off

ccs wrote:Scott was signed before the financial meltdown, Buchanan was released because of the financial meltdown - maybe the club believes Buchanan is currently still the better player of the two.
Or maybe we shouldn't consider playing anyone who's contract hasn't yet been renewed - it's still a long list!!

Maybe Bienek hasn't a release clause with Leigh, and they want to keep him?
Maybe Leigh released Scott?

Lot's of maybe's, but a good excuse to criticise the club, that's all you're looking for.

bonaire wrote:Why would Leigh want to keep Bienek and pay him when he is not playing?
Why would the club get a release for Scott and presumably take on his salary again,include him in the 21 then not play him?
Why when we are so short of forwards did the club not get a release for Bienek rather than Scott whose wing/centre position is well covered.
I understand some of your points but they dont make sense.
What it looks like is that Bienek has no future at the club and will be released