Kelly was available for the Hull KR match but not selected. This is presumably for two reasons - (a) no need to change a winning team following the Leeds game (especially after the halves played well) and (b) Radford knew Kelly wouldn't be avaialble for the following two games against Saints and Wigan so why bring him in for one game.
All very straightforward but the usual suspects barge in with their club-bashing.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29803 Location: West Yorkshire
ComeOnYouUll wrote:What's the fuss all about?
Kelly was available for the Hull KR match but not selected. This is presumably for two reasons - (a) no need to change a winning team following the Leeds game (especially after the halves played well) and (b) Radford knew Kelly wouldn't be avaialble for the following two games against Saints and Wigan so why bring him in for one game.
All very straightforward but the usual suspects barge in with their club-bashing.
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25922 Location: Back in Hull.
ComeOnYouUll wrote:What's the fuss all about?
Kelly was available for the Hull KR match but not selected. This is presumably for two reasons - (a) no need to change a winning team following the Leeds game (especially after the halves played well) and (b) Radford knew Kelly wouldn't be avaialble for the following two games against Saints and Wigan so why bring him in for one game.
All very straightforward but the usual suspects barge in with their club-bashing.
Couldn't the club have put him in the squad for the Rovers game , meaning it would have counted as one game or would that still not be counted and he have been allowed to play against Rovers?
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25922 Location: Back in Hull.
If this is the pack and bench for Wigan (rumoured on there board), then I'm feeling a bit more confident about us winning than I was, hopefully add in Faraimo, Bowden and Savelio.
Kelly was indeed in the squad for Rovers but I thought that was just because the squad was named before he received his ban?
I aren't blaming the club for anything. If we knew in advance that he was available for the Rovers game and just didn't select him then that's fair enough. And if we didn't realise he was available then I still don't really blame the club because this seems to go against what the operational rules say. I hope we are challenging it though.
Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:Kelly was indeed in the squad for Rovers but I thought that was just because the squad was named before he received his ban?
I aren't blaming the club for anything. If we knew in advance that he was available for the Rovers game and just didn't select him then that's fair enough. And if we didn't realise he was available then I still don't really blame the club because this seems to go against what the operational rules say. I hope we are challenging it though.
it seems, to some, anyone with questions has an "anti club" agenda, when all they are doing is asking questions. I guess some are just more righteous than others.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29803 Location: West Yorkshire
IR80 wrote:it seems, to some, anyone with questions has an "anti club" agenda, when all they are doing is asking questions. I guess some are just more righteous than others.
Stating outright that a bollock has been dropped and the club is "amateurish in the extreme" isn't simply asking questions, particularly when the circumstances aren't crystal clear. I guess some are are just more keen to pivot to the opinion that the club is at fault than others.
Dave K. wrote:If this is the pack and bench for Wigan (rumoured on there board), then I'm feeling a bit more confident about us winning than I was, hopefully add in Faraimo, Bowden and Savelio.
Bullock Powell Partington Isa Farrell Smithies
Clark Byrne Wells H Smith
You may well win the battle with you highly paid south sea islanders. But us blooding young local kids will win us the war (long term sustained success )
RICHARDS IS SUPERMAN!!!!
Wire_91 wrote:its your first final in about 8 years and now you ravin and rantin about it F**k off, and ill be going old trafford tomoz cheering on the saints and ill be writing on this forum givin you loads of shi* when your drying you eyes and the wire fan will be here handing out the tissues in the thousands, thats if you do take that many fans cause now it looks like its your fans who have jumped on the band wagon now your in a final, this time last year there was only 1000 people in the jjb and now its fillin up cause youve won the league hahaha proper true supporters you are
Mrs Barista wrote:Stating outright that a bollock has been dropped and the club is "amateurish in the extreme" isn't simply asking questions, particularly when the circumstances aren't crystal clear. I guess some are are just more keen to pivot to the opinion that the club is at fault than others.
and some pivot to the opinion that the club can do no wrong, there is a line between.
When it comes to it, as customers (you know, the people who PAY, every opinion is valid, if not right)
FC or the RFL f'd this one up, and still no answer to the PAYING fans, no wonder the paying fans are not bothering.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29803 Location: West Yorkshire
IR80 wrote:and some pivot to the opinion that the club can do no wrong, there is a line between.
When it comes to it, as customers (you know, the people who PAY, every opinion is valid, if not right)
FC or the RFL f'd this one up, and still no answer to the PAYING fans, no wonder the paying fans are not bothering.
I don't think there are many, if any, who think the club can do no wrong. But some can and do make haste to condemn when the full facts aren't available. A reflection of our times, perhaps.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
