bonaire wrote:No it doesnt its says Kelly not selected because of suspension when in fact he was available. As i said i am not certain Radford know about that as i cant see him preferring Johnstone on the bench if Kelly was available club cock up
bonaire wrote:No it doesnt its says Kelly not selected because of suspension when in fact he was available. As i said i am not certain Radford know about that as i cant see him preferring Johnstone on the bench if Kelly was available club cock up
This is getting silly - the club website confirms that Kelly was in the squad to play rovers, but not in the squad to play saints, because he was suspended.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
ccs wrote:This is getting silly - the club website confirms that Kelly was in the squad to play rovers, but not in the squad to play saints, because he was suspended.
Correct, hardly earth shattering after the Leeds win, but some seem to think it's an embarrassing cockup.
What's still crazy is the fact that the suspension didn't start until after the derby, when nothing in the RFL Operational Rules appears to suggest that's what should happen. If it's there, I haven't found it.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
ccs wrote:Correct, hardly earth shattering after the Leeds win, but some seem to think it's an embarrassing cockup.
What's still crazy is the fact that the suspension didn't start until after the derby, when nothing in the RFL Operational Rules appears to suggest that's what should happen. If it's there, I haven't found it.
ccs wrote:…. because the derby was on Friday 7th February, after the hearing by my reckoning. So not "not picked again".
RFL Operational Rules wrote:Suspensions will take effect from the day following the hearing at which the suspension was imposed, or the day on which any Penalty Notice challenge would have been heard if applicable.
appeared to be the ruling in force.
As I've said before, I still haven't found anything to contradict it, but Widnes (and Hull) think otherwise.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
IR80 wrote:so Hull have cocked up then, surely a phone call would have resolved the issue.
Anyway, Kelly isn't playing, we will find out against Catalans if it's anything more.
My understanding of this is that Kelly’s ban began at the same time as Satae’s, not sure why. He wasn’t picked to play against Dobbins, a lot made comments on here about changing a winning team. CCS has been right about it all along but as he said, “why didn’t the ban come into force at midnight on the day of the hearing” ?????
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum