Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:I am just interested to know whether the HDM have actually been told about this by someone either from the club or RFL. Or if someone has just stumbled across these rules and made an assumption.

Quote:Maybe the cancelled reserve game is the key - the rovers game (which didn't count at the time) had already been played before it was cancelled. Can we retrospectively claim the rovers game because there was no reserve match?

ccs wrote:I can't imagine it's the club, the HDM have got it so wrong. Bans start at midnight on the day of the verdict.

I've just edited my previous post....

Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:The whole thing just seems odd. Radford doesn't even allude to the confusion or the current situation there. He just talks about the tackle itself. It sounds like a quote from a couple of weeks ago.

Who knows?

HFC Boy wrote:Kelly was charged on Thursday the 6th February, at a tribunal for Championship and Reserve grades.
If the hearing was after the derby, then why didn’t he play?
He would have be eligible. Not picked again?

ccs wrote:…. because the derby was on Friday 7th February, after the hearing by my reckoning.
So not "not picked again".

IR80 wrote:so he wasn't suspended or not picked? that doesn't make sense...?

IR80 wrote:so he wasn't suspended or not picked? that doesn't make sense...?