Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:I am just interested to know whether the HDM have actually been told about this by someone either from the club or RFL. Or if someone has just stumbled across these rules and made an assumption.
I can't imagine it's the club, the HDM have got it so wrong. Bans start at midnight on the day of the verdict.
I've just edited my previous post....
Quote:Maybe the cancelled reserve game is the key - the rovers game (which didn't count at the time) had already been played before it was cancelled. Can we retrospectively claim the rovers game because there was no reserve match?
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
The whole thing just seems odd. Radford doesn't even allude to the confusion or the current situation there. He just talks about the tackle itself. It sounds like a quote from a couple of weeks ago.
Who knows?
ccs wrote:The HDM and still running another article with their take on the saga....
The whole thing just seems odd. Radford doesn't even allude to the confusion or the current situation there. He just talks about the tackle itself. It sounds like a quote from a couple of weeks ago.
Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:The whole thing just seems odd. Radford doesn't even allude to the confusion or the current situation there. He just talks about the tackle itself. It sounds like a quote from a couple of weeks ago.
Who knows?
That's how I read it, an old quote by LR added to a crazy theory.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
Joined: Nov 30 2002 Posts: 3524 Location: North Hull
Kelly was charged on Thursday the 6th February, at a tribunal for Championship and Reserve grades. If the hearing was after the derby, then why didn’t he play? He would have be eligible. Not picked again?
HULL FC CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS 2005 GRAND FINALISTS 2006 CHALLENGE CUP FINALISTS 2008 CHALLENGE CUP FINALISTS 2013 CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS 2016 CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS 2017
HFC Boy wrote:Kelly was charged on Thursday the 6th February, at a tribunal for Championship and Reserve grades. If the hearing was after the derby, then why didn’t he play? He would have be eligible. Not picked again?
…. because the derby was on Friday 7th February, after the hearing by my reckoning. So not "not picked again".
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
IR80 wrote:so he wasn't suspended or not picked? that doesn't make sense...?
sounds to me like someone at the club has dropped a bollock not knowing the rules. had Radford been informed then its quite possible kelly would have been on the bench for the HKR game.
Joined: Nov 30 2002 Posts: 3524 Location: North Hull
IR80 wrote:so he wasn't suspended or not picked? that doesn't make sense...?
That’s what I thought when he answered me ? His response doesn’t make sense !?
HULL FC CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS 2005 GRAND FINALISTS 2006 CHALLENGE CUP FINALISTS 2008 CHALLENGE CUP FINALISTS 2013 CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS 2016 CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS 2017
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
