nestegg wrote:The only condition is that a) you're not corrupt, and b) that you are not dumb enough to buy a Bulls 2020 season ticket in advance.
X
I'm in! Where do I get my membership card? Unless pretending to the food court in the Broadway Bradford that I work in the complex just to get a discount counts as corrupt. Then I'm kind of out...
The views in this post are mine and mine alone. Unless stated otherwise, they do not reflect the views of any company or entity I am associated with.
Joined: Oct 26 2005 Posts: 3251 Location: Bradford
nestegg wrote:The only condition is that a) you're not corrupt, and b) that you are not dumb enough to buy a Bulls 2020 season ticket in advance.
X
Cheap shot there. Those who have already bought a ticket will likely have done it on a credit card (smart), be amongst the most loyal of fans and be really hurting at the moment. Everyone has a limit.
Highlander wrote:Cheap shot there. Those who have already bought a ticket will likely have done it on a credit card (smart), be amongst the most loyal of fans and be really hurting at the moment. Everyone has a limit.
Fair point. Didn't mean to offend and apologies if we did. You are spot on re credit card payments, and the credit card processing companies will likely not release a substantial amount of funds to the club in the short term and stagger payments, in particular if they consider the club's current credit worthiness. There are also those fans who will have, or are, paying by debit card, or cash, of which there may be several; mind you as there is presently no club shop you can't use cash and have to book online, which may be a blessing in disguise. As you say if somebody wants a ticket then to pay by credit card is sensible. Mind you it may be more wise to wait a while and make sure that we will in fact have a team, or a club, at Xmas, or next season.
We have no doubt regarding Bulls fans loyalty and the hurt you/we feel. We deserve one hell of a lot better, as do the players and staff.
We hope there will be a positive way forward, but that may not be the one that's been tabled to date.
It says AC is 'Selling' his shares to the new consortium. Surely they can't be worth the paper they're printed on. What assets are there to sell apart from the brand and that's been completely tarnished. The club don't own anything apart from full time contracts that they can't afford to pay as far as I can see. As has been previously said, nobody is going to pay any money to take on somebody elses debt. Nobody was remotely interested last time until they knew they wouldn't have to pay the previous regimes debt after liquidation. Then, it seems, the RFL had to approach AC to take over. There's the old saying that the definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over and excpecting a different outcome. Every single new owner since the first Admin has done exactly the same as the previous one and the results have been the same. The only difference this time is no Odsal millstone but, as the RFL have only given a 12 month approval, then this is only temporary. We must have the biggest income from people paying to watch than any club in the championship, apart from Toronto maybe, yet we're still skint. Sheffield probably received about a 10th of what we did from gate money yet still manage to stay solvent with a similar standard squad.It seems obvious to me that the only way of being sustainable in this league is with a part time squad unless you have an owner with deep pockets and an undying love for their club. Unless one of our supporters wins euromillions, then i don't see how any consortium can stop us from racking up more debts unless they cut costs to an absolute minimum and that means going part time like Widnes have had to. The only club likely to be able to afford any full time players next year is London with their parachute payment and wealthy backer. It's not hard to see why Roger is so upset as Elliot gave up his day job to go full time this season and now he's likeley to have to find another club if he wants a full time future in the game. We'll just have to see how it plays out but i"m not getting my hopes up.
When they say “due diligence has been done”, that only means that the buyers know what AC has chosen to tell them. When the other debts start to be uncovered, who will be responsible for funding these? The consortium, or the RFL who failed to identify them in the due diligence? Or back into administration?
Joined: Apr 06 2016 Posts: 1226 Location: South of Bratfud
Don't know. The RFL managed to saddle Chalmers with paying the player with the legal challenge if you believe him. Which is strange considering their claim was against oldco and the RFL
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum