Joined: Apr 02 2004 Posts: 1278 Location: Not there
Maccbull_BigBullyBooaza wrote:London because they’ll probably lose tonight.
But I’d take either Hull KR (Hudgell) or Wakefield (Carter) over them every day of the week.
Imagine how funny it would be to see them ending up on the receiving end of that vote they bullied championship clubs into taking.
London staying up (with essentially the same squad that didn't set the Championship alight last year would show there's little to choose between the top of the Champ and bottom of SL) and one of those 2 going down (not sure which chairman would spit his dummy the furthest) would be ideal.
Mr Dog wrote:London staying up (with essentially the same squad that didn't set the Championship alight last year would show there's little to choose between the top of the Champ and bottom of SL) and one of those 2 going down (not sure which chairman would spit his dummy the furthest) would be ideal.
Wakefield must be feeling pretty confident because we’ve not had much of the old “it’s our livelihoods at stake” (like that doesn’t apply to anyone else).
Maccbull_BigBullyBooaza wrote:Wakefield must be feeling pretty confident because we’ve not had much of the old “it’s our livelihoods at stake” (like that doesn’t apply to anyone else).
That's likely down to the squad being put under a social media blackout
A game too far for the Broncos. Last nights relegation shouldn’t take away from what they’ve achieved this year. I like many others didn’t predict how well they would play with a predominantly Championship standard squad.
I’m looking forward to our trip to Ealing next season!
Joined: Mar 04 2005 Posts: 5880 Location: Bradford
Can't see it. There won't be many SL chairmen willing to give up some of their precious central funding allocation, especially for teams with such poor away support like London and Toronto.
Toronto aren't even guaranteed a place yet anyway because apparently their due diligence makes even Chalmers look competent
Joined: Mar 01 2002 Posts: 10969 Location: Bradbados
Nothus wrote:Can't see it. There won't be many SL chairmen willing to give up some of their precious central funding allocation, especially for teams with such poor away support like London and Toronto.
Toronto aren't even guaranteed a place yet anyway because apparently their due diligence makes even Chalmers look competent
Thing is though, it doesn't actually matter a jot if they've got a mega rich backer to pick up the tab. How many current SL clubs are viable just on their actual business income ? I don't know the answer but I'd suggest very few.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. Mark Twain
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum