Superblue wrote:Get out of it,

Both teams scored the same amount of runs.

Previously the winner in a first tie was the one who lost least wickets, why change that?

And yes I can see hat nobody would object to a change to 4s and 6s at the end of two ties because nobody thought it could happen.

The obvious thing to do and fair thing to do, was to have another over

Total and utter laughing stock

Can you just imagine the outcry had little england lost in that fashion, lol

Superblue wrote:I’ve never seen a team as lucky as England were today.

And what a way to decide the final, england didn’t get more runs than New Zealand, in the match or super over.
Didn’t the winner used to be the team that lost least wickets in a tie?
What happened to that ?

What a load of nonsense, victory awarded to the home team by the skullduggery of the powers that be.

How amateur and comical

WIZEB wrote:What's the difference between a cricket crowd and a Jeremy Clarkson Top Gear audience?

Riderofthepalehorse wrote:Go on then Wiz, what’s the difference

WIZEB wrote:Absolutely zilch.
Their both full of pillocks.

........And dont get me started about Wimbledon......

Riderofthepalehorse wrote:Lords was sold out, probably £200 minimum ticket price, approximately 30,000 some revenue. Amazing game.

The men’s Tennis final was apparently also outstanding.

Jeremy Clarkson we can agree on this

WIZEB wrote:You just cant take the council estate out of the kid.