hull2524 wrote:am sure it tasted a bit sweeter after that display,

Hasbag wrote:Had a good laugh at a post on the cas forum which said if you take Sneyd's kicks out of our game they we are shafted because we can't do anything else.
We only scored 1 try for a kick last night. Chalk that try off and we still would have beaten them.

number 6 wrote:some half time team talk by radders, very lethargic and easily pushed back by cas, going in at 14-4 after a dodgy 5th tackle penalty and a spill by kelly we were still in the game

some great tries 2nd half, some baffling video ref calls. seemed intent on wanting not to give us both our tries!

saw on twitter the on report was for another alleged bite on connor, anybody confirm?

newgroundb4wakey wrote:It was the opposite and if true in my opinion worse than biting. Just when you think Jake can't sink any lower he does.
Quite a few Cas players refused to shake hands with him which is unusual and says a lot.

newgroundb4wakey wrote:It was the opposite and if true in my opinion worse than biting. Just when you think Jake can't sink any lower he does.
Quite a few Cas players refused to shake hands with him which is unusual and says a lot.

newgroundb4wakey wrote:It was the opposite and if true in my opinion worse than biting. Just when you think Jake can't sink any lower he does.
Quite a few Cas players refused to shake hands with him which is unusual and says a lot.

Faithful One wrote:The opposite to biting? Please explain...

number 6 wrote:Maybe some cas players need to grow up and learn to take what they have dished out previously on the chin! from replays I saw I couldn't see anything malicious.