Riderofthepalehorse wrote:My preference would be Radders to continue, we know at times we’ve had results which frankly embarrass us, and last year it was a dire struggle at the end of the season, injuries although boring to talk about crippled us. I would think Radders is assigned to secure players for next year, so it does look like we are giving him a new deal.
It is a constant balancing act, keeping players happy, perhaps already knowing they will be leaving next year, but still wanting 100% from them this season.
And I suppose if you do go down the Warrington route paying Greg Austin wheelbarrow loads of dosh, how do other players like Hill or Ratchie feel about the pay structure, as a team game their value is just as great as Austin or Widdop.
100% correct, even marquee players need another 12 on the field with them.
