Erik the not red wrote:No Jake is right, Clarkson is Washbrook without the versatility, a squad filler rather than one near the first choice 17. Being good enough to be a regular starter in the dobbins pack and a Super League pack are not one and the same. Not a signing I would be happy about and neither would be Hock for any number of the many previously raised issues about him.

Jake the Peg wrote:I've not seen anyone on here over reacting and saying they won't renew if we sign hock and if we didn't discuss rumours and express opinions there wouldn't be much left to do

Jake the Peg wrote:I've not seen anyone on here over reacting and saying they won't renew if we sign hock and if we didn't discuss rumours and express opinions there wouldn't be much left to do

Chris71 wrote:The issue for me with Hock as a signing is we got rid/sold Watts who is without doubt one of the best forwards in SL and the rumoured reason being his discipline yet Hock is no where the level of Watts in today's game yet with more issues than Watts.

des lawson wrote:Your safe hock said on twitter he didnt want to take a backward step at this stage of his career.

des lawson wrote:Your safe hock said on twitter he didnt want to take a backward step at this stage of his career.

des lawson wrote:Your safe hock said on twitter he didnt want to take a backward step at this stage of his career.

jeffers wrote:sense of humour as well as getting out of jail.things are looking up out east