Winslade's Offload wrote:Looks as though Alffi is correct. I have had a riveting read through the RFl regs (section 5.8, salary cap) and it says that a loan for a SL club is viewed the same as a permanent deal and hence the player comes off the loaning clubs salary cap. Apologies.
That still begs the question as to why the club has done it. Was he a disruptive influence (intentionally or not)? Or did the club want the headroom to bring in another prop ? We are quite close to the business end of the season after all.
Thanks, saved me having to read it again!! No apology needed, they are hardly the best document to be looking through
I can only think we have someone lined up to come in - why else release him? Even if he only plays 25% of the remaining games he would be more useful than not having him around?
Can’t really see him being a disruptive influence, doesn’t really strike me as that type of player.