Joined: Aug 13 2011 Posts: 7194 Location: east east hull
Jake the Peg wrote:I'm pretty sure that you've been all over the forums most of the day saying he should be sacked.
Standee doesn't have the slightest grasp of anything in the real world and even claimed that the maccy d's employee contravened GDPR regs even though they're not even in force yet so I think we can disregard anything he says.
Of course someone can be sacked for something they do out of work if it can be proven that it is in contravention of company rules/policies. As none of us are privvy to these then you or I cannot say whether he could (or should) be legally sacked and morally I see no reason to sack him. Mow our moral compasses may be pointing in a slightly different direction on this one but even if they wanted to, Hull may not actually be in a position to sack kelly, just as they may not have been with watts.
The club cannot comment on teh specifics of what has happened for obvious reasons hence the very spare information coming from the club so we just have to accept it's been dealt with in line with company policies and move on
It wasn't a macdonalds employee who filmed it it was a customer
einstien said insanity is when a person does the same thing over and over again but expects a different result
Todd Carney's NRL career appears to be over after Cronulla sacked the five-eighth after a photo of him engaging in a vulgar act circulated on social media on Saturday night. The Sharks released a statement on Sunday evening to say: "The Cronulla Sharks Football Club has today after careful consideration and lengthy deliberation, including discussions with senior NRL management, made a decision to terminate Todd Carney’s NRL playing contract effective immediately. At the Sharks we are committed to building a successful club, a club with strong values and a club which sets and respects high standards in all aspects of its operations and activities. When Todd was first signed to the Sharks he was made well aware of his responsibilities both on and off the field, to himself, the club and to the game in general, however the photograph that appeared last night on social media does not meet the values and standards the club is looking to uphold and take into the future.
I doubt your club will have similar ethics , and what a coincidence both incidents relate to clubs called The Sharks .
PCollinson1990 wrote:bullshine, no employer can summarily dismiss someone for out of work behaviour, it's called EMPLOYMENT LAW.
You don't do Twitter because you wouldn't even follow yourself.
Todd Carney's NRL career appears to be over after Cronulla sacked the five-eighth after a photo of him engaging in a vulgar act circulated on social media on Saturday night. The Sharks released a statement on Sunday evening to say: "The Cronulla Sharks Football Club has today after careful consideration and lengthy deliberation, including discussions with senior NRL management, made a decision to terminate Todd Carney’s NRL playing contract effective immediately. At the Sharks we are committed to building a successful club, a club with strong values and a club which sets and respects high standards in all aspects of its operations and activities. When Todd was first signed to the Sharks he was made well aware of his responsibilities both on and off the field, to himself, the club and to the game in general, however the photograph that appeared last night on social media does not meet the values and standards the club is looking to uphold and take into the future.
I doubt your club will have similar ethics , and what a coincidence both incidents relate to clubs called The Sharks .
Joined: Jan 15 2007 Posts: 11924 Location: Secret Hill Top Lair. V.2
I don't go for banning people, I couldn't give a shizzle, but ffs I'd want this The Reason pillock banned solely for continuously posting the same thing over, and over, and over again.
I very rarely post over here, but here goes...
Here's a weird and strange truth.
The rugby league players that play for our respective clubs are not representatives of us as individuals.
We are not bastion's of the club's.
We do not represent those club's on a personal basis.
Those players are responsible for themselves and their own actions, they stand and fall by those no matter how much of a decent larker they are of a Sunday afternoon.
Full disclosure, I have a slightly important function happening soon that several Hull FC fans, I am ashamed to say, are members of my family will be attending.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.
Joined: Oct 07 2006 Posts: 4922 Location: Drypool Bridge - watching out for invaders from the East.
Sandro II Terrorista wrote:I don't go for banning people, I couldn't give a shizzle, but ffs I'd want this The Reason pillock banned solely for continuously posting the same thing over, and over, and over again.
I very rarely post over here, but here goes...
Here's a weird and strange truth.
The rugby league players that play for our respective clubs are not representatives of us as individuals.
We are not bastion's of the club's.
We do not represent those club's on a personal basis.
Those players are responsible for themselves and their own actions, they stand and fall by those no matter how much of a decent larker they are of a Sunday afternoon.
Full disclosure, I have a slightly important function happening soon that several Hull FC fans, I am ashamed to say, are members of my family will be attending.
Well said that man. I'm sick as ar**holes of Reverend Reason preaching to everybody when nobody wants to listen to him.
Sandro II Terrorista wrote:I don't go for banning people, I couldn't give a shizzle, but ffs I'd want this The Reason pillock banned solely for continuously posting the same thing over, and over, and over again.
I very rarely post over here, but here goes...
Here's a weird and strange truth.
The rugby league players that play for our respective clubs are not representatives of us as individuals.
We are not bastion's of the club's.
We do not represent those club's on a personal basis.
Those players are responsible for themselves and their own actions, they stand and fall by those no matter how much of a decent larker they are of a Sunday afternoon.
Full disclosure, I have a slightly important function happening soon that several Hull FC fans, I am ashamed to say, are members of my family will be attending.
Jesus Goose. Simply wait whilst said stains on your family are p#ssed then serve them chicken nuggets and ban them from future functions for life.
PCollinson1990 wrote:ignore Jake, he doesn't quite understand enactment and enforecement. Slightly short of thinking. A troll.
Really? New user name, same old martin. Full on loop the loop. You still driving that massive car, living in the mansion, earning huge amounts and travelling the world first class?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
