THE restaurant decor and the tshirt (released this year) he’s wearing give away that it wasn’t to long ago.

I never understand the need for multiple accounts. Yes if an overzealous mod bans you then come back, but multiple accounts is just silly.

We’ll see then , just what I’ve heard !

Bloke down the pub?

no, aunt's cousins hairdressers fella that overheard it on a ferry on the way back from Amsterdam...

Someone posted on Twitter that he'd signed a new 2 year deal. £200 grand a year and all the chicken nuggets he can eat. He has to pay for his own sluts and whores though

Okay.



Not what I said.



I genuinely try to keep the Rovers board free from bigoted abuse. Outside that I have less influence. I haven’t impacted on the generally relaxed towards Kelly’s behaviour here and, as a Rovers fan, the extent to which I have challenged it has maybe provoked worse. Do you, for example, feel it difficult as a woman and/or Hull FC fan, to challenge it? Or are my posts really the ones that leap out as beyond the pale, and in need of most urgent questioning?



You’ll have to remind me if I did say anything about Carney’s abuse of Bailey, as I can’t recall. But to be clear, i’m not holding Hull FC to a higher standard, just laughing at their (potential) discomfiture.



Still didn’t say that.



Oh, I want my cake and to eat it.

Rumour is sluts and whores included or no deal. He's prepared to let the all you can eat chicken nuggets go for all you all he can drink ale with sluts and whores thrown in.
The club could be financially better off with the second option.

http://upthecream.co.uk/has-albert-kell ... t-hull-fc/

http://upthecream.co.uk/has-albert-kell ... t-hull-fc/

To summarise:
You've called for condemnation of Kelly, quite a lot, on here over the last 24 hours and cited bigoted comments as a worse thing than Class A drugs. Fair enough. It seems odd therefore that you were far less discomforted by Hull KR signing Justin Carney due to his sacking for, er, bigoted comments. And also a bit shoulder shruggy about acknowledged instances casual misogyny. My beef I guess is that you're trying to disguise the same basic tribal hypocrisy we are all guilty of with a veneer of moral impartiality, which doesn't wash. Back to the Class A drugs thing for a moment as an aside; I assume you meant use of, rather than dealing in, as something to take relatively lightly?