no it isn't when it's an actuality over the matter being discussed

So bumpy believes he can be abusive if the poster disagrees with him.

That explains a lot.

Yes, welcome to Bumpyworld the new site for folk who like to be abused!!

Well, that St George team we had a run out against has won their first 3 games and sit at the top of the NRL.
And we'd have done them with our best 17 out.

They had a few ist team players missing but i have to say we played well and moved the ball about a lot more than we do here.
The other thing that helped our play was having two referees.
Just wish we had that system here.

Whatever, the poster said sports psychology in team sports isn't useful/any good or whatever ramble, when it is. I gave links for them to read, they still wouldn't bother to admit they were wrong, basically outing that they don't understand anything about how important it is and how it can improve individuals within a team environment, that means they don't have a clue, ergo clueless.
That isn't abuse, that's pointing out an actuality of someone who is ignorant of a very basic matter when it comes to performance in not just sport but elsewhere in life.
HTH

I'll sit back and let others decide whether your overwhelming knowledge and evidence presented of the essential value of sports psychology for a team sport has convinced anyone else apart from your imaginary friends in your head. As I noted earlier an amateur like Adam Pearson seems to disagree with you.

A mere coincidence that we played with Steeden balls in that game and not the sh*tty Rhino balls? Our ball handling was superb against St George.

Possibly but i think the fast play the ball we had as a result of the two ref system helped our style of play.

True, all we need to do now is learn how to deal with other team's quick PTBs as they're making far too many quick yards for my liking!