Right I'm feeling generous so I'll check your lazy google search and we find
1st All examples quoted are individual sports people and therefore totally irrelevant to what I posted, 2nd is advertising bumf pretentious jargon with no examples of successful application at all 3rd a student essay which re-circulates gobbledegook without once again providing practical proof of successful application. 4th suggests it might have a use but then brings up that discredited clown Dr Steve Peters and points to his spectacular failure in the World Cup, exceeded in its uselessness only by the Brazilians who had their own charlatan. Hardly a ringing endorsement. Do you even read your own links? 5th Advertising bumf after your cash - no verifiable evidence of success. 6th likewise 7th generalised bumf and jargon. And what a surprise no evidence of practical successful application. 8th wow you must have slipped up here as at least there examples quoted in it. The teams across the various sports that have used the psychologists do have have one startling thing in common though. The have all won absolutely nothing since that article was written, nil, zero.
Am I supposed to put a row of smilies here next?
It looks like Adam Pearson is of the same view about having a sports psychologist on the staff. He has been prepared to invest in back up which will improve the team like better training facilites, conditioning and medical support but not surprisingly is less keen on throwing away his cash on a snake oil salesman. Then again he only has a long and largely successful history in sports management so no doubt struggles to compete with your blinding knowledge.
Right I'm feeling generous so I'll check your lazy google search and we find
1st All examples quoted are individual sports people and therefore totally irrelevant to what I posted, 2nd is advertising bumf pretentious jargon with no examples of successful application at all 3rd a student essay which re-circulates gobbledegook without once again providing practical proof of successful application. 4th suggests it might have a use but then brings up that discredited clown Dr Steve Peters and points to his spectacular failure in the World Cup, exceeded in its uselessness only by the Brazilians who had their own charlatan. Hardly a ringing endorsement. Do you even read your own links? 5th Advertising bumf after your cash - no verifiable evidence of success. 6th likewise 7th generalised bumf and jargon. And what a surprise no evidence of practical successful application. 8th wow you must have slipped up here as at least there examples quoted in it. The teams across the various sports that have used the psychologists do have have one startling thing in common though. The have all won absolutely nothing since that article was written, nil, zero.
Am I supposed to put a row of smilies here next?
It looks like Adam Pearson is of the same view about having a sports psychologist on the staff. He has been prepared to invest in back up which will improve the team like better training facilites, conditioning and medical support but not surprisingly is less keen on throwing away his cash on a snake oil salesman. Then again he only has a long and largely successful history in sports management so no doubt struggles to compete with your blinding knowledge.
Erik the not red wrote:Right I'm feeling generous so I'll check your lazy google search and we find
1st All examples quoted are individual sports people and therefore totally irrelevant to what I posted, 2nd is advertising bumf pretentious jargon with no examples of successful application at all 3rd a student essay which re-circulates gobbledegook without once again providing practical proof of successful application. 4th suggests it might have a use but then brings up that discredited clown Dr Steve Peters and points to his spectacular failure in the World Cup, exceeded in its uselessness only by the Brazilians who had their own charlatan. Hardly a ringing endorsement. Do you even read your own links? 5th Advertising bumf after your cash - no verifiable evidence of success. 6th likewise 7th generalised bumf and jargon. And what a surprise no evidence of practical successful application. 8th wow you must have slipped up here as at least there examples quoted in it. The teams across the various sports that have used the psychologists do have have one startling thing in common though. The have all won absolutely nothing since that article was written, nil, zero.
Am I supposed to put a row of smilies here next?
It looks like Adam Pearson is of the same view about having a sports psychologist on the staff. He has been prepared to invest in back up which will improve the team like better training facilites, conditioning and medical support but not surprisingly is less keen on throwing away his cash on a snake oil salesman. Then again he only has a long and largely successful history in sports management so no doubt struggles to compete with your blinding knowledge.
#owned
Cup Winners: 1914, 1982, 2005, 2016, 2017. Cup Runners-Up: 1908, 1909, 1910, 1922, 1923, 1959, 1960, 1980, 1983, 1985, 2008, 2013. League Champions: 1920, 1921, 1936, 1956, 1958, 1983. League Runners-Up: 1957, 1982, 1984, 2006.
Joined: Nov 23 2009 Posts: 12755 Location: The Hamptons of East Yorkshire
knockersbumpMKII wrote:It wasn't me who started being abusive because I'd made a statement about us needing a sports psychologist and how important it is.
Joined: Oct 07 2006 Posts: 4927 Location: Drypool Bridge - watching out for invaders from the East.
knockersbumpMKII wrote:It wasn't me who started being abusive because I'd made a statement about us needing a sports psychologist and how important it is.
Are you for real?? It seems to be second nature to you to be abusive. If you can't take it, don't give it.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
