no charge for watts, or any other player from the game looks like they realised it was a wrong decision by the officials, (not that they will say that) http://www.rugby-league.com/article/509 ... rs-charged

no charge for watts, or any other player from the game looks like they realised it was a wrong decision by the officials, (not that they will say that) http://www.rugby-league.com/article/509 ... rs-charged

NO CHARGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Whoop whoop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you RFL:

1. for seeing sense
2. for helping to cost us 2 points

Unbelievable
Maybe shamed by all the media attention.
just need Carlos to be fit
Hope Masi gets a bench spot and Connor keeps his place at right centre

Great news! Never doubted that it was a ridiculous decision!

I am now questioning if the result of the Wigan game might have been different if we had had 13 men though. But look, that has gone now, no changing it, bring on Wakey!!!

Great news but we lost the game, a critical game, predominantly because we were down on energy in the last ten minutes because we had played a man short since the first half.

We've been robbed again by the officials, after last week and Burrows not getting ten minutes for what was nothing short of an assault on Connor but then being charged afterwards and it happening at a time when we could have gone on to win the game for me at the very least it's just unfair!

Its worrying that the best referee in Super league is Bentham yet it was his call as the video ref that gets Watts sent off and possibly costs us the match.

i think we would have won if watts had stayed on, mcilorum was out for the match, his own fault unfortunate for him, powell nowhere near the hooker mcilorum is plus they would be one interchange down.

guess we will never know

Would love it if they refs had to apologise to the player and the club for these sort of incidents. Couldn't get to the game as I'm out the country, but sounds as though we'd have won with 13 men.