Egg Banjo wrote:We took arguably three of their better players at the end of last year
Not really, they were considered surplus to requirement at Hudds and were not going to be offered new contracts. So I don't think we took them.
Assuming we planned to keep Hirst then they are as ever pinching players . Personally think what we did and what allegedly Hudds are doing are ethically two separate things.
It's not even what they are doing it's how often they do it. It's a sheer lack of imagination if nothing else.
Have to say though it shows a staggering lack of ambition from Hudds, maybe the Davey money is running out. I like Hirst but considering Hudds supposedly being an ambitious club I wouldn't say Hirst fits that bill.