number 6 wrote:I haven't heard radfords' interview, so cant comment, but the arm flapping from mcdermott after that tackle proved it was way over the top for a player who missed 1 game, the length of the ban was correct, 2 games irrc

PrinterThe wrote:Only a 2 match ban after being charged with a Grade D 3-5 matches. People are right, the disciplinary are a joke.

ccs wrote:It was downgraded to C, if you'd bothered to read the verdict summary.

PrinterThe wrote:I did and that's exactly the point where grades are given out originally and then downgraded. Happened a number of times and again shows the poor quality of the disciplinary.

ccs wrote:It just shows how bitter you are.

number 6 wrote:ban length was correct imo seeing as mcdermott tried to sway the panel into thinking mcguire was out for weeks when in reality it was 1 game!

as for burrow, to some on here he will be viewed as a grub for his headbutt just because he took offence to the hand off from connor! imo video ref should have viewed the incident just like the ellis one earlier in the game, no doubt he had, burrow would've walked

SirBlighty wrote:If anyone has read League Weekly Cummings column absolutely slates Hulls indiscipline and says we crossed the line with the ref.
says Leeds took all the decisions on the chin and just got on with it.

PrinterThe wrote:Ban length was around 2 weeks too short, doesn't matter what the coach said. What are you views on Radfords comments about wishing he could've got away with dropping the head on someone? Perfectly fine I imagine?

Jake the Peg wrote:I'm pretty sure radford's comments were tongue in cheek unlike mcdermott who had clearly forgotten to take his mdication