Post subject: Re: Mark minichello Speaks out about player welfare
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:30 pm
Jake the Peg
International Chairman
Joined: Mar 22 2007 Posts: 30474
Hessle Roader wrote:Somebody should ask Jamie Peacock for his thoughts on this. He's written 2 articles in the Mirror which are diametrically opposed to each other.
Post subject: Re: Mark minichello Speaks out about player welfare
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 5:27 pm
knockersbumpMKII
International Chairman
Mrs Barista wrote:Great that Radford's youngsters bossed those of the best academy in SL. Pleasing.
'bossed'? Jack downs did well, Fash has a great attitude, Matongo was okay but constantly takes the ball virtually standing still so doesn't make any extra metres after contact, Turgut is not impressing me to be honest. Ryan sutton is well ahead of all of them, Jack Wells is 19 and did just as well as our lads, Callum field is also 19 and marshall (21) was the pick of the wingers. I'd hardly say our youngsters 'bossed' theirs but they did do well. my point still stands, Radford has not brought anyone through from the academy to be a starting XVII player in his tenure. We have not delveloped any backs whatsoever from the ranks.
Post subject: Re: Mark minichello Speaks out about player welfare
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 5:51 pm
Mrs Barista
International Board Member
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
knockersbumpMKII wrote:'bossed'? Jack downs did well, Fash has a great attitude, Matongo was okay but constantly takes the ball virtually standing still so doesn't make any extra metres after contact, Turgut is not impressing me to be honest. Ryan sutton is well ahead of all of them, Jack Wells is 19 and did just as well as our lads, Callum field is also 19 and marshall (21) was the pick of the wingers. I'd hardly say our youngsters 'bossed' theirs but they did do well. my point still stands, Radford has not brought anyone through from the academy to be a starting XVII player in his tenure. We have not delveloped any backs whatsoever from the ranks.
A simple question. If Peter Gentle had his way, Jamie Shaul would not be at Hull FC. Who can be credited with his first team tenure therefore?
Post subject: Re: Mark minichello Speaks out about player welfare
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 6:18 pm
DGM
International Star
Joined: Mar 03 2015 Posts: 2490
knockersbumpMKII wrote:'bossed'? Jack downs did well, Fash has a great attitude, Matongo was okay but constantly takes the ball virtually standing still so doesn't make any extra metres after contact, Turgut is not impressing me to be honest. Ryan sutton is well ahead of all of them, Jack Wells is 19 and did just as well as our lads, Callum field is also 19 and marshall (21) was the pick of the wingers. I'd hardly say our youngsters 'bossed' theirs but they did do well. my point still stands, Radford has not brought anyone through from the academy to be a starting XVII player in his tenure. We have not delveloped any backs whatsoever from the ranks.
Ffs
Cup Winners: 1914, 1982, 2005, 2016, 2017. Cup Runners-Up: 1908, 1909, 1910, 1922, 1923, 1959, 1960, 1980, 1983, 1985, 2008, 2013. League Champions: 1920, 1921, 1936, 1956, 1958, 1983. League Runners-Up: 1957, 1982, 1984, 2006.
Wonder if Shannon McDonnell would have scored that try yesterday? Because if Gentle had been retained he'd have been your starting full back, and Shaul would have been plying his trade elsewhere. Radford is bringing the young players on in the correct manner. This year will stand them in good stead and Turgut is a future captain of the club. Wane has been able to bring his young players into a long established winning culture. Radford hasn't had that good fortune.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
