[quote="ccs"][/quote]

Looking at that I expect Watts to get one match due to his record, he shouldn't but that what I expect to happen.

Well that's confidence booster in the ability of the disciplinary process. Apart from the Gale charge Watts is also mentioned for another incident, though it is no charge, in the 32nd minute. I blame Dr Who.

His record with us is actually very good, only 2 charges found him guilty, one an EGP (NFA) and the other the 4 match ban earlier in the season.

That's good then, I thought they was more, so it should be SOS then inline with Amor

It should be a case of SOS as with Amor but we all know the disciplinary panel are a law of their own so it could be anything. Just hope they have some common sense and realise it was not malicious nor high it was nothing more than an unfortunate collision of a defending player affecting a tackle and the attacking player suddenly going low due to another defending player tackling around the legs. As I've said earlier if this is a red card offence then no team in 80mins of rugby will finish with 13 on the pitch.

The ref saw Gayle starfished and due to the cocks ups they have made in not sending players off Watts paid for the incompetence in the officials.

Hope the club ask the RFL Disciplinary committee how they came about incident 434/17 with Watts in 32nd minute?? Regardless of it saying no charge how can they name Watts when he was off after 22mins!!!!

I did notice that and wondered myself how incompetent are they

Let's hope His Honour Judge Chris Batty QC, a member of the review panel, knows his rugby.

Graeme Hallas and Jon Hamer are the other two.

Lets hope he doesn't place the black cap on his head then

5.15pm hearing so shouldnt be too long to wait

Any news?