Schofield is the Katy Hopkins of RL journalism and gets column inches by being controversial and trying to get a bite. Radford has given him exactly wht he wanted by biting back.

Pretty much it really. I'm surprised radford even bothered to respond let alone seeming lose his rag over it

What have we got to do with this thread, how did we enter in the debate !!!

Looks like Marc has rammed somebodys words right back up their big, fat, larddy @rse tonight.
Well done Radders for having his back.

Let's be honest, Schofield does have a point. Sneyd does go missing from time to time. The good news is that he's turned the criticism into a positive - now back it up with some consistency.

Schoey is bang on. Until Sneyd wins a golden boot then he shouldnt be challenging a hall of famer in both hemispheres to anything.

Headline should be "Mark Sneyd makes all his doubters eat their words and sticks two fingers up to Judas"

The only thing you wouldn't want to challenge Schofield to is going toe to toe at an all you can eat buffet.

Why do his opinions have to be at the extreme all of the time? Its for effect rather than being informed, fact driven debate.

No he's just honest. He says what most of us think. Sneyd with ball in hand for the most part is Crap. Good kicking game, great goal kicker. Average defender.

Why is he a Judus? Hull sold him and Crooksy as the club was going under. Schoey openly says he never wanted to leave but don't let that cloud your paranoia.