Joined: Aug 13 2011 Posts: 7194 Location: east east hull
Faithful One wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if we'd left a bit if cap space to accomodate an emergency signing if needs be. Although thinking about it, maybe we're using some of the money left over from Frank's departure to improve contracts eg Shaul, rather than spend on a new player.
I think if we were really desperate we could recall Abdull (I know they've come out and said it's for the full year, but im sure I read on the rfls operational rules that players can be recall from loans once they've been gone for more than 28 days).
If a player goes on loan for the full season he can't be recalled
einstien said insanity is when a person does the same thing over and over again but expects a different result
Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 7735 Location: Here there and everywhere
I think the squad is far better balanced that it was last season.
The fact we didn't cop much in the way of injuries exaggerated our depth in the forwards as it meant lads who would usually have played more games didn't get a chance to.
With another year under their belts to develop physically, I'd expect to see Downs and Masi (along with others) get their chances.
Dave K. wrote:How will be know if our young players are as good a standard as Wigans if we don't give them a chance.
Hard to say about injuries, but I think we are as strong if not stronger this season in the forwards, ok we have lost Frank, but the likes of Masi, Turgut are a year older, stronger etc.
Pack will be fine, always a loan signing if we are struggling.
The young players will get a chance this season. Bringing them in for the odd game to gain experience is what you want but you can't expect them to play week in week out if we have long term injuries. I still think we should have signed another forward instead of Michaels as we already had enough cover in the backs.
Joined: Sep 23 2008 Posts: 1916 Location: Top of the East Stand
fun time frankie wrote:If a player goes on loan for the full season he can't be recalled
Not sure about that...
Quote:RULES RELATING TO LOANS C1:2:13A Club shall not be entitled to either loan a Player or receive a Player on loan unless: (a) it ensures that the relevant loan form (correctly completed as prescribed by the Board from time to time) is completed and immediately sent to the RFL; (b) it receives an acknowledgement of loan registration from the RFL; C1:2:14 Any loan must be for a minimum period of 28 days save where the loan agreement states that the Player may only play for the Reserve or Academy team in which case the minimum period shall be 48 hours. C1:2;15 The Board shall be entitled to refuse the registration of a loan in any of the circumstances set out in Operational Rule C1:2:1 and may cancel the registration of a loan in any of the circumstances set out in Operational Rule C1:2:2 (or, in either case, may impose such terms and conditions as it considers appropriate). C1:2:16 It shall be permissible to extend a loan which complies with Section C1:2:14 for a period of less than 28 days (provided that such extension is effected before the initial term of the loan expires). The requisite form shall in such circumstances be promptly submitted to the Board. C1:2:17 Any loan (whatever its original duration) may be terminated after it has subsisted for at least 28 days by: (i) written agreement of the Player and both Clubs; or (ii) in accordance with any agreement set out in the Loan agreement which termination shall be notified to the Board in writing, C1:2:18 Where a Club does not run an Academy team at the appropriate age group for one or more of its registered Players it may loan the Player(s) to another Club to play in that Club’s Academy side only. C1:2:19 The Board shall be entitled to use its discretion to allow special arrangements on consideration of written application from the Club(s) concerned C1:2:20 Payments to Loan (and Dual Registration) Players must be made in accordance with A3:5.
C1:2:17 seems pretty clear. Can't see anything else about season long loans. The only issue I can see would be the salary cap.
... only if all 3 parties agree to terminate the loan, unless the original arrangement specifies otherwise.
We want him to stay all season, rovers won't want him to leave if he's playing well, we won't want him back if he's playing badly, so I doubt there is a get out clause.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
Joined: Sep 23 2008 Posts: 1916 Location: Top of the East Stand
ccs wrote:... only if all 3 parties agree to terminate the loan, unless the original arrangement specifies otherwise.
We want him to stay all season, rovers won't want him to leave if he's playing well, we won't want him back if he's playing badly, so I doubt there is a get out clause.
If Sneyd, Kelly, Connor, and Tui all suffer long term injuries at the same time, I'd imagine we'd be keen to take him back early Its only going to happen if there is a major injury crisis, but I'd like to think there would be something stipulated in the contract which allows for an early termination should it be required. Hopefully we won't need to find out.
didnt know about that.Good player though. I think we are a missing a prop.its an injury prone position and we only need Taylor and Watts out at the same time and we will be very lightweight there.
Joined: Nov 30 2002 Posts: 3524 Location: North Hull
fun time frankie wrote:If a player goes on loan for the full season he can't be recalled
They can be , and probably will be if parent Club have injuries. Dodgy business by Rovers having 2 loanee halfbacks .
HULL FC CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS 2005 GRAND FINALISTS 2006 CHALLENGE CUP FINALISTS 2008 CHALLENGE CUP FINALISTS 2013 CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS 2016 CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS 2017
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum