Irregular Hoops wrote:Always thought he was quite strong in the tackle.
Maybe misses a few, but don't suppose we are getting him in for his defensive qualities.

mean_machine wrote:As a general consensus of opinions on this board both Albert Kelly and Lee Radford got slated. Will be the odd exception but as a whole I am vindicated in saying as such.

Of course he is keen to come, he's currently unemployed.

I hope it works out for him, RL needs more creative players and flashes of brilliance as opposed to drop offs and kicking games. If he could have the right mentality I'd have him above Sneyd. But there is a very slim chance of that. I hope Radford doesn't try and coach it out of him either as I suspect he doesn't have the temperament to control a game, or even play to a game plan.

rover 2000 wrote:was it you dave who said not 1 rovers player would get in your team have you changed your mind or taken them daft glasses you always wear off

rover 2000 wrote:ditto

davey37 wrote:Always thought his defence was quite good tbh.

I'm sure I have seen him make some decent tackles albeit on TV.

rover 2000 wrote:was it you dave who said not 1 rovers player would get in your team have you changed your mind or taken them daft glasses you always wear off

fun time frankie wrote:It's a myth about him been a poor defender the thing is if you look at his stats he may have a lot of missed tackles but he probably tackles more than any other half in the league I've always thought him a very strong tackler and probably does to much defending