Joined: Feb 09 2008 Posts: 9342 Location: King George Dock
I wouldn't have played Thompson last night he's not effective enough against the big teams like Wigan. Bowden would have been the better option imo. Don't think he was injured, just a tactical change.
"You don't have to be great to start, but to be great you have to start".
Sorry but I think Thompson is just as effective in any scenario, he took the ball up with pace and tackles well too, as ever I'll get shot down in flames but personally I'd have Thompson over Washbrook, the former's work rate is just so much higher. If Pritchard doesn't improve over the next few weeks LR really needs to think long and hard over the 17 because on a hot day with forwards blowing out their arris on a fairly big pitch (it's bigger than ours) we can't afford to carry a passenger and thus far Pritchard has been a passenger more often than not. For what he is taking out of our cap and will take more next year (backloaded contract hence the need to reduce others salaries) he is nowhere near VfM
Panda92 wrote:I know Frank would be better outwide, but how can we have him starting there when Minichiello and Manu are both playing fantastically?
It would allow Both Mini and Manu to be interchanged appropriately.Both played last night without interchange when Pritchard and Thompson were on the bench
agree, Pritchard imo isn't spending enough time on the pitch, maybe am expecting to much but am not seeing the blockbusting runs hes noted for, esp near the line I thought he might at least run onto a crash ball once or twice, bit on the fence atm regarding frank,
once a black and white always a black and white COYH
I agree he would be more effective player a bit wider, and I can also understand why people might have expected more tackle busts etc. But the notion that he's not pulling his weight and it's having a detrimental effect on others is absolute rubbish.
He has the best average gain in the team apart from Shaul, and he averages more carries and metres per game than any of our forwards. In fact I beleive he's the best second row in the comp for each of these stats (I think he might be behind Dave Taylor if you class him as a second row). He doesn't do a massive amount in defence, but that's not his game, and his tackle success is actually very good (third best in the team by my reckoning behind Hadley and Watts).
He's perhaps not played the type of game we were expecting, but I'm more than happy with his contribution.
Joined: Feb 12 2005 Posts: 13126 Location: East Staffordshire
knockersbumpMKII wrote:Sorry but I think Thompson is just as effective in any scenario, he took the ball up with pace and tackles well too, as ever I'll get shot down in flames but personally I'd have Thompson over Washbrook, the former's work rate is just so much higher. If Pritchard doesn't improve over the next few weeks LR really needs to think long and hard over the 17 because on a hot day with forwards blowing out their arris on a fairly big pitch (it's bigger than ours) we can't afford to carry a passenger and thus far Pritchard has been a passenger more often than not. For what he is taking out of our cap and will take more next year (backloaded contract hence the need to reduce others salaries) he is nowhere near VfM
Washy's inside defence on our right was absolutely top drawer. He's been superb this year at the unnoticed stuff this year but it's slightly more subtle so you've probably missed it as a result.
"To play your best football you need players with enthusiasm and drive and energy." - Peter Sterling
Adam Pearson said not wrote:I know there are two franchises and two clubs (in Hull) and that will remain forever more
Staffs FC wrote:Washy's inside defence on our right was absolutely top drawer. He's been superb this year at the unnoticed stuff this year but it's slightly more subtle so you've probably missed it as a result.
I haven't missed anything, Washy does alright but I prefer the pace of Thompson and what he offers when we have a large pack that is gassed. Washbrook was missing a heck of a lot of tackles earlier in the season (I haven't looked since) and using him the way we do he is neither fish nor fowl. I'd rather we went with a proper hooker interchange the way Radford uses him.
You have your opinion I have mine, I'd have Hadley in front of him as well the way we play and I'd have Washbrook (well) in front of Pritchard currently.
Joined: Feb 12 2005 Posts: 13126 Location: East Staffordshire
knockersbumpMKII wrote:I haven't missed anything, Washy does alright but I prefer the pace of Thompson and what he offers when we have a large pack that is gassed. Washbrook was missing a heck of a lot of tackles earlier in the season (I haven't looked since) and using him the way we do he is niether fish nor fowl. You have your opinion I have mine, I'd have Hadley in front of him as well the way we play and I'd have Washbrook (well) in front of Pritchard currently.
Dean Hadley is an excellent player and is having a really good season. As with others not selected like noggers and Jordan Abdull he's unlucky not to play. Seems to me like we're trying to get some match fitness back into Frank.
My young son realises that Washy has been high quality in everything he's done this year and his versatility means he's an ideal bench choice. I agree with him.
"To play your best football you need players with enthusiasm and drive and energy." - Peter Sterling
Adam Pearson said not wrote:I know there are two franchises and two clubs (in Hull) and that will remain forever more
Joined: Feb 19 2009 Posts: 1957 Location: East stand!
Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:I agree he would be more effective player a bit wider, and I can also understand why people might have expected more tackle busts etc. But the notion that he's not pulling his weight and it's having a detrimental effect on others is absolute rubbish.
He has the best average gain in the team apart from Shaul, and he averages more carries and metres per game than any of our forwards. In fact I beleive he's the best second row in the comp for each of these stats (I think he might be behind Dave Taylor if you class him as a second row). He doesn't do a massive amount in defence, but that's not his game, and his tackle success is actually very good (third best in the team by my reckoning behind Hadley and Watts).
He's perhaps not played the type of game we were expecting, but I'm more than happy with his contribution.
Correct. Exactly how I see it. Only not made 100 metres in a game about 4 times. We don't use him correctly though. We could do to fix that up.
Don't worry. Sneyd and Houghton was crap according to many not even 200 days ago on here lol
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum