upthecats wrote:Grow up? Yeah, alright Dad...

A man already motionless and held by two tacklers, not expecting it takes one right on the button...and that's OK in your world?

If that had been a Wigan player on one of yours I'm sure you would be calling it very differently!

upthecats wrote:Maybe our chairman is getting just a little peed off at the inconsistency from the disciplinary panel when we've had bans for Arona and Scruton for nothing tackles then last week a Sheffield player injures Arundel for a month with a needless cannonball tackle, clear as day on the video and gets away no case to answer..

Let's see what happens...

Jake the Peg wrote:I knew you'd be on with your overtly biased opinion on the game. Fact is that wakey needed piggy backing up the field with penalites or errors from us. Other than that you struggled to make decent yardage. Other than a 20 minute or so spell when we went to sleep we completely dominated you.

Stats

Metres made

wakey 941 Hull 1377

Carries

wakey 144 Hull 170

Average gain

wakey 6.5m Hull 8.1m

Average no of players in the tackle

wakey 1.7 Hull 1.9

wakey - 1 player over 90m made in the game

Hull - 8 players ove 90m made in the game.

We dominated you and the scoreline doesn't reflect that domination due to a brief spell when our defence slackened off . Accept it or try and argue otherwise, I don't really care but facts are facts.

I'm not saying wakey didn't play well because they did but never in a million years were you the better side

airliebird,runninglate! wrote:How I saw it. Never ever in a million years was pritchard to Shaul forward. That would of taken the score over 50.plus the goal that was but wasn't takes it to possibly 54. So being a bit tighter for that spell really could of hit 60 odd. Either way I've never ever ever seen a team score 40odd points keep a side to 4 points in the 2nd and be anything other than dominant

Jake the Peg wrote:Or how a team which makes less than 1000 metres in a game deserves anything but a hammering. Had our defence not gone to sleep in that 2nd 1/4 the scoreline would have been more reflective of our dominance

Jake the Peg wrote:Or how a team which makes less than 1000 metres in a game deserves anything but a hammering. Had our defence not gone to sleep in that 2nd 1/4 the scoreline would have been more reflective of our dominance

The Avenger wrote:If my grandma had balls she'd be my grandad, so what's your point?

The Avenger wrote:If my grandma had balls she'd be my grandad, so what's your point?

Isaiah wrote:or a shemale

The Avenger wrote:She'd fit in well in Hull then!