Seems you have a coffee related fetish too.
What 'type' would that be? The type Responding to purile points scoring posts aimed at deliberately trying to goad a reaction as part of that persons fetish so they can get off....guilty
The type that responds to posters that deliberately aim to deraill threads, (which she does constantly) and adds nothing to the discussion related to the topic matter, yeah I'm guilty of being that 'type' too.
Go on, please enlighten me as to what 'type' I've reverted to? Or would you rather discuss the ins and outs of the topic matter or are you that 'type', the disciple that sips from the coffee cup?
I pity you if as it seems it's the latter.

Calm down love. You're beginning to sound like General Zod.

That ver radders says some will twist to suit . Some just don't rate or like him IMO and that's fine. In all honesty am still not 100% but if we keep going like we are he's invited for Xmas dinner to our house lol

Erm.that sounds wrong lol.what it's meant to say is. Whatever radders says some will twist.

Houghton has suffered the wrath of many on here, claiming he had no kicking game, his distribution was weak and he was generally too slow. All of which is utter cack.

Sneyd regularly get panned by those I sit near in the stadium, His offence is that Peason paid a fee for him

Pryce was bagged before he'd even played a first team game.

HTH

But not in this case.

I have never seen Houghton's kicking game or speed criticised on here. Not once. Of course I could have missed it.

Criticism is not the same as abuse.

Indeed. Nothing wrong with criticising players who aren't playing well or not doing the jobs they're supposed to be. Players come in and out of form - when they're off form then criticism is merited. It's certainly not abuse as you say.

Not far off

Not bad pal, did you have a flutter?