Mrs Barista wrote:He's partly right though if you read the article. Miller was brought in to do a job he was unable to do at the time (20) and the fans recognised this and that Sneyd and Pryce brought more to the table, again at the time. Not sure it's our fault for wanting a more successful team given the preceding barren years though. Also, and I may be wrong, wasn't Miller cited as one player Pearson and Radford disagreed on, AP rating him and Radford not?
i was quite happy to give him time, a 20 year old half back who appeared to have all the skills.
I don't know who these fans are that Radford claims to understand but a lot of the times when he expresses the fans views he gets it dead wrong.