Sal Paradise wrote:Thurston would the highest earner at the club a bit like the CEO at Morrisons - he is the star performer, you would hope your CEO is likewise.
However to include Thurston Leeds would have to ditch half the squad to accomodate him due to him earning approx half the cap - Morrisons don't have to ditch half the board to accomodate a new CEO because they can only spend £6m on directors. They are free to go out and hire anyone they want without it impacting either the financial or employment status of anyone else
Simple really
Morrisons have a turnover of roughly £16 billion. Once you realise the numbers involved your comparison starts to look flawed at best.
Try comparing with a company of similar size and turnover and all of a sudden salaries become a major issue. Every position at my company has a salary range when we are recruiting and finance put strict limits on salaries compared to turnover. If we don't have the money we don't hire the people. A private company like ourselves has to live within its means. Sure, it's taken us longer to do some things but a lot of the companies we have encountered as competitors and customers over the last 20 years of our existence have gone bust or faced savage job cuts before being bought and stripped out.
Sport isn't like business, it's emotional and it's entertainment. When you combine those factors people go bonkers.
It may just be the simple truth that the "Market" for rugby league in this country simply cannot support significantly higher salaries for players. The problem with sport is that supporters and even club chairmen desire victories on the pitch. Real industries measure success by revenue, sports clubs measure success by winning games. That's why so many sporting organisations end up in the $h1te.