Went to the game with a mate of Broughs (he give them his tickets) deal is agreed with player and Hull, just trying to still sort out a deal with Hudds. Not sure if it will happen or not, as I don't think Pearson will rightly pay over the odds.

Pearson's piece in the programme isn't denying our interest either . He's still a great player , Fabulous kicking game & leader.

After his performance tonight, I'd have him back. Very unlucky with his first attempt at a 40/20, second was a pearl. Take him out of Hudds. team and they'd really be in the mire. Besides Mrs. B, needs the 40/20 for her bucket list but the way Sneyd is growing into the player he will be, it can't be long before he gets one. Houghton might beat him to it.

Was the best player on the pitch before he was sin binned, I'd have him back for the right deal to play with Sneyd.

Quite possibly cost them the game as we scored 12 points when he was in the bin.

What was he binned for, mouthing the ref?

He needs to learn when to STFU. But he never will.

He is still a quality player on his day and in previous years he would have kicked us to death.

Didn't see the game tonight but i have always been of the opinion that refs have an agenda against Danny.

Watched the game at Cas last week and at times he looked as if he wanted to win the game single handed and at others he looked as if he couldn't give a fig. Could be to do with how he thinks the players around him are performing.

We've got two very good halves at Cas just now with Luke Gale and Ben Roberts but I'd still take a motivated Danny in a heartbeat.

Depends what you want from a leader. If he's going to spit his dummy out, boot the ball dead during good attacking field position, and get binned for mouthing off, then I'd rather we stayed away. As others have said, his attitude cost them the game tonight.

I'd add that the only reason they were ever in the game was because of him. He plays they've got a chance, he doesn't they haven't.