Gotcha wrote:I am glad you pulled that up, I wanted you to be the one just to prove my point exactly.
So I never said Clark needed Westerman, like you posted. I said it clearly what it was, and what happened, and what is happening. We pulled out of a deal for both Clark and Westerman. Clark wanted to be back over here, and hence his desire to make the move to Leeds, and why Wire were a willing seller. We didn't see it through and Wire making other arrangements. Westerman was told the deal was done with Leeds, but Leeds wouldn't agree Hulls fee. My exact post at the time was (and before the papers and others) was that Leeds had gone back on the deal as they believe the Burgess deal is a goer. The same Burgess confirmed we were still in for by our CEO weeks after. I also said at the time on a post after the one you pulled up, as people got stupid (like you) that the chauffeur line was taken too literally. Wire paid the full fee for Westerman has it totally fit for them, in that Clark had a lift from his mate, and could locate where he wanted. I made it clear on that second post that of course they didn't just sign for a lift.
Please don't tell us you do know but keep quite. For gods sake you have only been going during the bandwagon days, and even then you seem to attend no more than a third of games. You know nothing outside of the club and below the professional game. Only last year you tried to make out you knew what Morgsn Smith was on, got a bit loose there with those lips, but as usual was totally wrong. Then you had the cheek to tell us Ward had a bad game at Hull KR last year, just because I said he was very good, because you didn't hear his name on the radio.
For your information, talking about things is not loose lips. Rugby League unlike football, is a community sport. And involving yourself in community clubs, something I doubt you have ever been involved in, conversations always take place whilst a lot of time is spent there. I personally, regardless of you, will continue to repeat what is discussed, unless anyone tells me specifically not to. And for your information I have been told specifically not to on two current dels for next year, but they dont involve Leeds. However, there are people who post on here who are a lot closer to any info than the likes of me,
Your complete lack of been in any loop sees you have a go at people continuously. You have already been picked up this year on Frosties. You deflect this in to then accusing two posters of been the same. You are not on a good run, with your barrel of excuses deteriating rapidly. If I were you I would keep to your own advice, and keep quite and a little less presence. Stop the jealous bitching all the time and maybe you can learn something, and who knows pretend you are in a loop instead.
Of course this constant deflection does work to your advantage in terms of the current plight of the club, which is far more important than your little bitch rants all the time. If you took some time to move away from the end of last season, and start to concentrate on what has been happening for weeks now in the current season, someone might actually take you seriously.
As you always want the last word, I have no doubt you will want to respond, but can you do it to PM so it does not deflect from what the board is about, and bore everyone with the bitching. I will even let you have that last word, promise.
You made a BS claim about Westerman giving Clark lifts over to Warrington. You meant it and it was shown up to be nonsense and since have backtrack claiming you didn't really mean it. You did mean it you just got shown up for the BS that it was and that's always your excuse when one of your rumours gets shown up....."oh I didn't mean that"
I love the feeble attempt to portray me as a SL era glory bandwagon fan......no I didn't follow the club pre SL but considering I was only born in the late 80's I'm not sure how I can be faulted for not supporting earlier than 1997.
How was I picked up on Frosties? He made claims that I said wouldn't happen and low and behold they didn't happen yet and just like your chaffeuer nonsense you still try and claim otherwise.
You think I'm wrong about what Morgan Smith was offered, maybe I am maybe I'm not. Unlike yours and Frosties claims which got shown up for being clearly wrong I've not seen anything to say I was incorrect apart from you disagreeing with it which was inevitable as you're obsessed with criticising the club in your desperation to look in the know. You constantly criticised them about how they handled the various Hardaker incidents and you claimed the club apologised to him and agreed the treated him harshly for his World Cup exit......they did no such thing. Your mate in the Hardaker camp clearly only gives you Hardaker's version of events which makes him look hard done by and they never told you he got into a fight with a Carnegie player on his night out and the club have no problem with how they punished him.
As pointed out before regarding the Ward issue, I never said he had a bad game, I suggested that you exaggerated his performance because he's one of your favourites and slagged off McGuire's whose one of your usual targets even though most agreed McGuire had a very good game.
Again if you want to believe that i don't know anything about the club or the game below the professional level without knowing me then so be it.....all that shows is just how desperate you are to be Mr In the Loop and how defensive you are when challenged about it