With all due respect Stan, you have been subjecting the 'non-believers' to the exact same abuse, so that argument doesn't really carry any merit.

He thinks because we don't believe in a flat earth we are all slaves to mainstream media. I haven't bought a mainstream media newspaper since the late 1990s but I still get branded a sheep by the flat one.

It's not racism it's criticism of bad ideas and statements. All that people have been doing is pointing out ridiculous claims and statements. From Flat earth to holographic satellites and beyond. Calling someones ideas lunacy and stupid is not racism. Even calling someone mental isn't racist. I know you're a christian, I don't know which denomination, but it wouldn't matter if you were a Jew, Hindu, or a muslim with the same views. Those views are still open to criticism whether you like it or not.

You need to stop kidding yourself that you're the victim, while subjecting everyone who disagrees with you to the same levels of abuse that allow you to get on the victim bandwagon.

Nearly every reply to a post is laced with sarcasm, condescending bites, insults, and arrogance. Yet you don't see it?



I think most people would be friendly and gentle if you weren't such a horrible, nasty, reactionary individual. I think you've been ingesting too much mercury from those fillings...

"This clown". Your second and third words are ad hom abuse! That's a rapid start!

Let's see how you continued:


See, this is YOU, Stan, you never make a post without coming across as the world's biggest asshole. And then you claim it is other people being "ad hominem".


See, most everyone knows that there is a permanent base at the South Pole, and many people do go there, there is as much evidence as any reasonable person would need.

But your response is the same as it always is - you simply make a bald claim that whatever evidence there is, it's not true, and you would do the same whatever happened. Even if you were taken there.

And thatis delusional. That isn't "ad hom" but a statement of truth. You are often delusional. You deny the existence of things even where they are in plain sight. Like the ISS - you refuse to look, even though your own eyes could see it. Because you prefer to stick to your "it doesn't exist" delusion.


It really is idiotic for you to use that "argument". Even if it wasn't bleedin' obvious (the image is exposed for a bright planet, not extremely faint stars) your objection relies on "them" yet again carelessly "forgetting" to fake a star background for one of the most seminal images of the century! If you really believe that then you would truly be neutron-star dense. Are you?



We've been over and over these arguments before [/quote]
No, I have been over many arguments before, and YOU always swerve them with abuse, sarcasm, dotty YouTube links or other swerevs which comprise 99% of your standard posts.

You almost NEVER go over any single argument ANYONE puts to you, so do not lie that you do.


You didn't!. You came up with a completely bogus scenarion about a lamp in a room, which would disgrace a 6 year old! I merely pointed that out, and have been awaiting your reasoned explanation as to why the Moon looks upside down from Australia ever since. But I of course know you will never respond
a) because you never present a cogent argument, ever, to anyone
b) and because you need to cling to this delusion, you prefer not to think about it

Now, going back to some of the points you swerved, YOU said that Byrd travelled "internally", I said you don't seem to grasp that he couldn't actually travel internally unless there was somewhere internal to travel to. But you ignore it.

YOU said that when a person does venture into Antarctica, they'd be travelling "inland". As of course they would, seeing as it's at the south end of a globe.

How do you explain Byrd, or anyone, travelling "inland", when you claim there IS no land and when even if there were, on your "flat" model, "inland" is the opposite of where a person would be heading - presumably they'd fall off the other side of your ice wall and be eaten by a turtle or something?

But as ever, you will not and do not respond. You just throw out your standard, tiresome, bilious smokescreen.

That's why everyone concludes you have nothing to say, because you never debate, you never argue, you never consider anything that conflicts with your personal dogma and so you say nothing. You hide behind other delusionals YouTube drivel and don't actually have a view of your own, or if you do, it is never one that you can articulate.

I'm getting rather peeved with the typical unprovoked vitriolic ad hominem name calling within this thread which is being liberally conversed by two particular posters constantly without any warnings or attempts of discouraging this behaviour.Without delving into other threads just this thread alone has a plethora of their vitriolic abuse here is a sample of their typical postings. Here is a compilation of these vile posts. If this isn't trolling i don't know what is.

So. Theres proof of a poster Trolling with what looks like he's got an emotional childish playground grudge against me. I've counted 4 x legitimate posts he's contributed in this thread where vitriolic ad hominem remarks haven't been made.

Heres the other culprit who abuses in most exchanges. He is supposed to be trying to set an example having the status of a moderator. This is just for this thread alone:




So there you go. This is just the tip of the iceberg if you take in other threads into account. But this is just this thread alone. I may have a varied view of the world than most people but does it deserve the above ad hominem. I may have slipped up and made certain jibes back in retaliation at some point but never on the above scale. I've also been accused of being a troll but i've not abused anyone like the above posters have in this thread. Sticks n stones i can take all day maybe but it doesn't make pretty reading and the culprits look the like the very words they're insinuating sadly. Me a troll.

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:See, this is YOU, Stan, you never make a post without coming across as the world's biggest asshole.

And thatis delusional. That isn't "ad hom" but a statement of truth. You are often delusional. Because you prefer to stick to your "it doesn't exist" delusion.

It really is idiotic for you to use that "argument". Even if it wasn't bleedin' obvious (the image is exposed for a bright planet, not extremely faint stars) your objection relies on "them" yet again carelessly "forgetting" to fake a star background for one of the most seminal images of the century! If you really believe that then you would truly be neutron-star dense. Are you?

b) and because you need to cling to this delusion, you prefer not to think about it

That's why everyone concludes you have nothing to say, because you never debate, you never argue, you never consider anything that conflicts with your personal dogma and so you say nothing. You hide behind other delusionals YouTube drivel and don't actually have a view of your own, or if you do, it is never one that you can articulate.

So hang your heads in shame. I've never insulted you in a brain capacity. You insult with brain accusations in every other word. Oh and thanks for reminding everyone that i don't argue. Hahahaha as highlighted. Its you two what instigate trouble. Period.