Adam_Harrison9 wrote:Out of interest, what's your opinion on Arundel? (You'll also notice how I haven't replied to the other comments because that would be the childish thing to do... or is putting this as an aside classed as 'childish' too? Who knows?
)
FWIW he's a slogger, but appears to be nothing more - he may surprise us who knows. He's a decent squad player but what still baffles me is the decision to let Wallshaw go who by comparrison was IMHO a much better and more versatile player. I know he's not pulling up trees at Bradford but he was starting to for us. Arundel will always be judged on that which is unfair but there you go.
