Last week, whist in possession of the ball, Tamou made deliberate contact with an open hand to the face of Galloway and got ten minutes. This week, whilst in possession of the ball, Pritchard made deliberate contact with an open hand to the face of Milner and didn't get ten minutes. If the offence is identical, why is the punishment different? Discuss.
davey37 wrote:Would Tamou have got 10 minutes if the punch and subsequent melee had not happened? Probably not and play would have just continued.
He might have done, we don't know because Garbutt came in and lamped him one! What you are saying is that Tamou was sin binned because he got punched after his bitch-slap but as the Cas players didn't react, Pritchard wasn't sin binned?
Baxendale wrote:From what I saw of Hicks it looked like he'd signalled that Milner had raked his (Pritchards) eyes?
Having watched it again, there is a camera angle from behind the try line that shows McMeeking go across Frank's face in the tackle - Milner is holding Frank down by the collar
One of the most experienced players on the field....
match is tied, nailed on for going down to the last minute....
You have the ball inches from our line on tackle 3....
He pushes/slaps an opposition defender in the face whilst playing the ball....
I bet Radford was delighted with him.
I agree with the sentiment though, Tamou 10 minutes for a pretty weak slap, Pritchard nothing for a similar, if anything firmer "slap".
Strange.
I wonder if he will be cited maybe a grade A formal warning?
It was hardly "striking", he never intended to actually hurt milner. It was controlled red mist - if that exists.... so a grade A formal warning would seem fair?
Joined: Feb 21 2003 Posts: 3460 Location: West Hull
nottinghamtiger wrote:He might have done, we don't know because Garbutt came in and lamped him one! What you are saying is that Tamou was sin binned because he got punched after his bitch-slap but as the Cas players didn't react, Pritchard wasn't sin binned?
I am saying Tamou got binned because the whole incident became more than just a slap. Galloway and Tamou were already pumped trying to prove who is the hardest. You could sense something was going to kick off.
Frank`s was totally out of the blue and totally out of character. Him and Ellis seemed to be indicating some foul play had gone on but don't think that is evident from the camera angles.
DAVE@CAS1990 wrote:One of the most experienced players on the field....
match is tied, nailed on for going down to the last minute....
You have the ball inches from our line on tackle 3....
He pushes/slaps an opposition defender in the face whilst playing the ball....
I bet Radford was delighted with him.
I agree with the sentiment though, Tamou 10 minutes for a pretty weak slap, Pritchard nothing for a similar, if anything firmer "slap".
Strange.
I wonder if he will be cited maybe a grade A formal warning?
It was hardly "striking", he never intended to actually hurt milner. It was controlled red mist - if that exists.... so a grade A formal warning would seem fair?
Whilst it was obviously a penalty against Pritchard the only thing I can think of is that no other players have reacted and caused a fracas. In Tamou's case his slap led to someone throwing a punch and other players kicking off
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum