Joined: Apr 29 2010 Posts: 585 Location: In two minds
knockersbumpMKII wrote:If Talanoa isn't fit who'd you go with Micheals or Lancaster? Micheals looked in good nick yesterday and is a very good defensive back.
Michaels, he's better defensively, and offers the same in attack.
Joined: Jul 08 2006 Posts: 2059 Location: West Hull
Has much as I love to see young local lads come through I can not see the point in brining Michaels over and not playing him
If I'm really honest I think we should of not resigned him, he is a good player and I like him but I have always thought if you sign an Aussy they need to be someone who's really going to make your 17 every week or what's the point
At the moment I don't think Steve does make the 17, but What do I know we will probably get injuries and be glad we have him in the squad same as Lee Smith
Overall we look very strong squad wise and dare I say it but some of our fringe players like Hadley, Green, Bowden, Whiting, smith, Michaels, feka, Lancaster, Fash, Turgut all look a lot better than Rovers have in there 17 there looking for loan players is the rumour wonder if ...... no surly not lol
Having watched the game last night on KC Sport and not being in the state of euphoria, that I would have been if I'd gone, I think FC played very much the same as last season, forwards running up and one man rugby BUT the massive difference was, when the break came we had players in abundance backing up. The half backs had more time and room behind the dominant pack. Still a bit of sloppy defending for their tries but their third came off the back of a superb 40-20. I hope we perform the same against Super League opposition LOL, and when match fitness is obtained, Sika was blowing a bit, we should go well.
Last year we were 2nd for clean breaks so the game plan to some extent did work, we were just not clinical enough in the opposition 20 which looks, from sundays game, to have been resolved slightly. Their 3rd was un-defendable for me - the ball from Kelly was majestic
knockersbumpMKII wrote:If Talanoa isn't fit who'd you go with Micheals or Lancaster? Micheals looked in good nick yesterday and is a very good defensive back.
Naughton for me, but there are pros and cons for all three, wouldn't complain whichever is picked.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
