Joined: Feb 12 2005 Posts: 13126 Location: East Staffordshire
knockersbumpMKII wrote:who mentioned compelling evidence he (Shaul) was leaving, I certainly didn't say Shaul was, bother to actually read my first post again and use your brain cells to understand what it says. In my second post I said there was evidence for what I referred to after being told none of it was a fact, if things are so rosy between Shaul & Radford why are we trialling Smith, what possible reason is that occurring when we have FB cover already, we have cover in all the backs positions.
if you want to believe all the gash that comes out the club fine, I don't and I certainly don't have my head up Radford's arris like a lot of you do, I'm surprised he can walk.
You're easily led. Don't worry about it. Some folk are.
"To play your best football you need players with enthusiasm and drive and energy." - Peter Sterling
Adam Pearson said not wrote:I know there are two franchises and two clubs (in Hull) and that will remain forever more
knockersbumpMKII wrote:who mentioned compelling evidence he (Shaul) was leaving, I certainly didn't say Shaul was, bother to actually read my first post again and use your brain cells to understand what it says. In my second post I said there was evidence for what I referred to after being told none of it was a fact, if things are so rosy between Shaul & Radford why are we trialling Smith, what possible reason is that occurring when we have FB cover already, we have cover in all the backs positions.
if you want to believe all the gash that comes out the club fine, I don't and I certainly don't have my head up Radford's arris like a lot of you do, I'm surprised he can walk.
Cup Winners: 1914, 1982, 2005, 2016, 2017. Cup Runners-Up: 1908, 1909, 1910, 1922, 1923, 1959, 1960, 1980, 1983, 1985, 2008, 2013. League Champions: 1920, 1921, 1936, 1956, 1958, 1983. League Runners-Up: 1957, 1982, 1984, 2006.
Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 7735 Location: Here there and everywhere
knockersbumpMKII wrote:who mentioned compelling evidence he (Shaul) was leaving, I certainly didn't say Shaul was, bother to actually read my first post again and use your brain cells to understand what it says. In my second post I said there was evidence for what I referred to after being told none of it was a fact, if things are so rosy between Shaul & Radford why are we trialling Smith, what possible reason is that occurring when we have FB cover already, we have cover in all the backs positions.
if you want to believe all the gash that comes out the club fine, I don't and I certainly don't have my head up Radford's arris like a lot of you do, I'm surprished he can walk.
You used the the word "fact" on multiple occasions. In reality it was not fact, it was (for you) at best an opinion, but probably made up to fit your vitriol.
It's you that is putting a connection between the possible signing of Smith and an issue with Shaul.
If you could be. Bothered, you would either find or better still remember I have criticised Radfords position on here. Yet you feel the need to use sexually referenced insults to try to prove a failed point.
Ok, you don't believe what gets put out into the public domain. I am taking it you don't watch the news any more? Or if the club announce a signing, do you not believe that either.
As I put on an earlier post. You are a clown. And that's clearly evidenced with fact
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Fabricated text messages are the worst source, then.
