But I think we have around 16 players who could get us a £5k dispensation each (could have totally got the wrong end of the stick, mind). Doubt we'd use it anyway but could create upside of £80k on the cap,
But I think we have around 16 players who could get us a £5k dispensation each (could have totally got the wrong end of the stick, mind). Doubt we'd use it anyway but could create upside of £80k on the cap,
But I think we have around 16 players who could get us a £5k dispensation each (could have totally got the wrong end of the stick, mind). Doubt we'd use it anyway but could create upside of £80k on the cap,
Could benefit us, Leeds and Wigan spring to mind but as Mild Rover says, it's OK if you can afford it????
But I think we have around 16 players who could get us a £5k dispensation each (could have totally got the wrong end of the stick, mind). Doubt we'd use it anyway but could create upside of £80k on the cap,
Could benefit us, Leeds and Wigan spring to mind but as Mild Rover says, it's OK if you can afford it????
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
Armavinit wrote:Could benefit us, Leeds and Wigan spring to mind but as Mild Rover says, it's OK if you can afford it????
A total guess, but would imagine contributing around 16 players to the comp is about average? If I've read it properly there's a limit of £100k to the dispensation, so probably not a big advantage, especially if, like you say, you can't afford it. Would be interesting to see who has the most/least, but just looking at ours was a pain so won't be doing that.
Joined: Jan 02 2003 Posts: 43413 Location: rlfans flying wing man
I think it's only players currently at you club that meet the criteria of playing 10 SL games in the previous season, even if them games was on loan at another club
With KR having so many loaned in, every other club should thank them
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
Hutchie wrote:I think it's only players currently at you club that meet the criteria of playing 10 SL games in the previous season, even if them games was on loan at another club
With KR having so many loaned in, every other club should thank them
Maybe so, it depends how you interpret 5.11c. I'd used Mild Rover's view which seems to be the spirit of the opening statement of the section in rewarding clubs that produce SL players for the competition rather than only those retained by their original club. If it's only those at the club, academy trained by the club and with SL 10 games last year it's less. I'd assumed you could count the likes of Lee, Briscoe etc in the same way MR was counting Mariano. Would be quite difficult to get to the maximum of 20 otherwise, having 20 players on your books raised through your own academy and with 10 SL or NRL games last year is a big ask.
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12671 Location: Leicestershire.
Mrs Barista wrote:Maybe so, it depends how you interpret 5.11c. I'd used Mild Rover's view which seems to be the spirit of the opening statement of the section in rewarding clubs that produce SL players for the competition rather than only those retained by their original club. If it's only those at the club, academy trained by the club and with SL 10 games last year it's less. I'd assumed you could count the likes of Lee, Briscoe etc in the same way MR was counting Mariano. Would be quite difficult to get to the maximum of 20 otherwise, having 20 players on your books raised through your own academy and with 10 SL or NRL games last year is a big ask.
Yeah, it'd seem strange to me if you were getting a dispensation for Josh Hodgson, but not for Tom Briscoe. Unless it were only for players returning from the NRL to their first club. Production rather than location of players is what matters from a RFL POV though - there's no particular value in them incentivising clubs re-signing their former players.
It can be read the way Hutchie has, but it just doesn't seem very sensible to me.
Good spot on the £100k limit - missed that. Hull won't be far off that - Wheeldon, Hall, Lee, G.Horne, Briscoe and Hodgson, on top of those at Hull.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
Mild Rover wrote:Yeah, it'd seem strange to me if you were getting a dispensation for Josh Hodgson, but not for Tom Briscoe. Unless it were only for players returning from the NRL to their first club. Production rather than location of players is what matters from a RFL POV though - there's no particular value in them incentivising clubs re-signing their former players.
It can be read the way Hutchie has, but it just doesn't seem very sensible to me.
Good spot on the £100k limit - missed that. Hull won't be far off that - Wheeldon, Hall, Lee, G.Horne, Briscoe and Hodgson, on top of those at Hull.
Reece Lyne also I think. The Hull ones probably Shaul, Logan, Yeaman, Abdull, Houghton, Green, Bowden, Hadley, Washbrook. Tbf not sure whether all meet the 21s criteria eg Shaul, nor who would claim Lineham as I think he was at York at that age. We'd probably get Crooks counted next year though. A decent contribution in terms of numbers anyway.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
