Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.

But by acceptable I of course mean mickey poor in any other context than the shambles that is London Broncos.

So how can we answer if you haven't set an 'acceptable' benchmark?

Come on let's stop all the usual cr4p and start fronting up on your comments.

Is everybody hard of English on here?

I gave an opinion (1,500) & then asked a question.

You're the one who needs to front up not me.

Obviously you are showing up your poor understanding of the English language, actually what you did was ask a question, then you answered it yourself. Not the way round you have stated. If you ask a question expect answers if you ask an ambiguous question expect people to ask for clarification. Had you made a straight statement that in your opinion we should be looking at 1500 as a minimum.
But, actually defending you here, it was a pretty fair question just badly worded, a straight forward what do we think the crowd for first home game is going to be. As for acceptable! Acceptable to who?

Forgot to put my opinion, to be brutally honest I reckon 1000 would be a realistic figure, not saying that's acceptable I am just saying that's what I reckon it will be close to

Following the way last season fizzled out and the move to Ealing I think we'll be doing well to get 600-700

400 for me, unless they have a marketing push which may take it to 5-600.

Is that acceptable?? Who knows I've not seen the financial strategy for the business.

There IS a financial strategy???

'Acceptable' has to be gauged/bench-marked against something........or it will be neither acceptable or unacceptable

CN maybe you can lead us on this as you are looking to chip away at the club at every opportunity

Should we just accept your offering of 1500 (which you know wont be achieved|) then after the game see whether it was acceptable or otherwise to you. Is that the game?

Come on CM provide some guidance as i'm hard of English

David Hughes saw "Brewster's Millions" & was impressed by Richard Pryor's head for business.