Your whole condescending argument is based on the words Zionism, fascism and Nazism not being evident in Pikes Era.
Nazism- first appearred in the mid 1800's but became more mainstream in 1920 when NSDAP merged withthe Volshich movement see hear Five key points -
1. Though Nazism claimed to be a new movement, many of its core ideas had deeper roots in German history, particularly the nationalism, authoritarianism and militarism of the 1800s.
2. Germany was itself a comparatively new nation, created through the unification of 26 different kingdoms in 1871. This unification was the product of strong nationalism and decisive military victories.
3. The Prussian kings and Junker elites who ruled imperial Germany in the late 19th century were conservative, authoritarian and militaristic, but also progressive with many of their policies.
4. The security and prosperity of late 19th century Germany made many Germans nostalgic for authoritarian government, something the Nazi movement was able to tap into in the early 1930s.
5. Another repository of traditional values and German ethnic nationalism was the grass-roots volkisch movement. Many members of volkisch groups later joined the NSDAP. - See more at: http://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/the ... lXHEE.dpuf
WIKIPEDIA: Prehistory of National Socialism 1834 the term "Nationalsozialismus" last appears in Print: Börsenblatt für den deutschen Buchhandel, page 36 1870 the term "National Socialism" first appears in English: "The sects of the Russian Church", The North British review, Volumes 52-53. 1884 "National Socialism", mentioned in "Fabian Tracts", Fabian Publications, Great Britain. 1896 The Czech National Social Party is formed. 1897 Franko Stein moves a small periodical Der Hammer from Vienna to Eger. May 1898 Maurice Barrès, while standing as a nationalist candidate for Nancy, France, coins the term "Socialist Nationalism". 1898 German Workers Congress organized by Stein in Eger (Cheb). Apr 1902 Organization of Nationalistic Labor took place in Saaz. Nov 15, 1903 Deutsche Arbeiterpartei in Österreich formed. (DAP) 1904 Hans Knirsch proposes to add "National Socialist" to the Austrian DAP name; rejected by party congress confrees. 1909 "All-Austrian" congress of the German Workers’ Party held in Prague. NATIONAL SOCIALISM EXISTED SINCE 1834, .
Even if the letter was hoaxed which it clearly isn't, it's accuracy in predicting the current world situation pre-WWIII is spot-on. So if it isn't authentic why is it so perfectly prophetic?
Your obviously clutching at straws. You'd have a lot more credibility if you could at least string more than a sentence to the thread, rather than mud sling unresearched drivel.
Your whole condescending argument is based on the words Zionism, fascism and Nazism not being evident in Pikes Era.
Nazism- first appearred in the mid 1800's but became more mainstream in 1920 when NSDAP merged withthe Volshich movement see hear Five key points -
1. Though Nazism claimed to be a new movement, many of its core ideas had deeper roots in German history, particularly the nationalism, authoritarianism and militarism of the 1800s.
2. Germany was itself a comparatively new nation, created through the unification of 26 different kingdoms in 1871. This unification was the product of strong nationalism and decisive military victories.
3. The Prussian kings and Junker elites who ruled imperial Germany in the late 19th century were conservative, authoritarian and militaristic, but also progressive with many of their policies.
4. The security and prosperity of late 19th century Germany made many Germans nostalgic for authoritarian government, something the Nazi movement was able to tap into in the early 1930s.
5. Another repository of traditional values and German ethnic nationalism was the grass-roots volkisch movement. Many members of volkisch groups later joined the NSDAP. - See more at: http://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/the ... lXHEE.dpuf
WIKIPEDIA: Prehistory of National Socialism 1834 the term "Nationalsozialismus" last appears in Print: Börsenblatt für den deutschen Buchhandel, page 36 1870 the term "National Socialism" first appears in English: "The sects of the Russian Church", The North British review, Volumes 52-53. 1884 "National Socialism", mentioned in "Fabian Tracts", Fabian Publications, Great Britain. 1896 The Czech National Social Party is formed. 1897 Franko Stein moves a small periodical Der Hammer from Vienna to Eger. May 1898 Maurice Barrès, while standing as a nationalist candidate for Nancy, France, coins the term "Socialist Nationalism". 1898 German Workers Congress organized by Stein in Eger (Cheb). Apr 1902 Organization of Nationalistic Labor took place in Saaz. Nov 15, 1903 Deutsche Arbeiterpartei in Österreich formed. (DAP) 1904 Hans Knirsch proposes to add "National Socialist" to the Austrian DAP name; rejected by party congress confrees. 1909 "All-Austrian" congress of the German Workers’ Party held in Prague. NATIONAL SOCIALISM EXISTED SINCE 1834, .
Even if the letter was hoaxed which it clearly isn't, it's accuracy in predicting the current world situation pre-WWIII is spot-on. So if it isn't authentic why is it so perfectly prophetic?
Your obviously clutching at straws. You'd have a lot more credibility if you could at least string more than a sentence to the thread, rather than mud sling unresearched drivel.
Joined: May 24 2007 Posts: 7504 Location: East Stand
FLAT STANLEY wrote:Whats that saying? Oh yeah....."problem, reaction, solution".
The conflict is that the NWO needs the middle east under their paws to domesticate the world for themselves.
So, they create a problem "Muslim terrorist" (by training militants or creating false flags) *** Then the reaction by the public "please save us from the Muslims", when the Muslims **in truth** are just reacting over the millions that have been killed by the West in the last decade. Please tell me how great you would be feeling if your family was blown to bits. And the solution?? Paris rushes themselves further into the NWO by allowing more funds and persons to support (knowingly and unknowingly) the NWO.
Now, multiply this "false threat" over the world.........and soon the world believes they have to protect themselves against the Muslims, when in REALITY the NWO just wants to blow more of them up and domesticate them to BIBLICAL LEVELS The more I think about this, the more it seems to be a false flag from Western interests. This is a work around in response to Putin's taking the game away from the cia by bombing ISIS targets. They are switching gears now to have an excuse to intervene in Syria. Hollande's declaring it is "an act of war" makes things clear as to what their plans are. Damn, they want Assad out of there so bad now, they can taste it. Lets watch this unfold!
The invasion of male 'refugees' into Western Europe (Germany) provides perfect cover but that is a whole different kettle of fish. How that diaspora of the German state will dovetail down the line is anyone's guess. It's hard to believe that the Germans have not yet taken to the streets in large numbers. Sweden as we know, is now the rape capital of the West. The French people will want action of some sort after this. If the government doesn't respond, then the people on the streets will. Could quite easily be the trigger for major civil unrest spreading throughout Europe.
According to Simon Parkes in a recent interview, the Pope at the UN was the kick-off in earnest of the NWO. It seems to be panning out that way. This is like the Albert Pike prediction of WWIII with the forces of the West (Christianity) versus Islam leading to a complete breakdown of society in the End Game. And if you don't know who Albert Pike is and don't know what he predicted in 1871 i suggest you read this link http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm
The thing I can't quite see is if A) You're just trying to get a reaction or, B) You are seriously un-hinged.
FLAT STANLEY wrote:Whats that saying? Oh yeah....."problem, reaction, solution".
The conflict is that the NWO needs the middle east under their paws to domesticate the world for themselves.
So, they create a problem "Muslim terrorist" (by training militants or creating false flags) *** Then the reaction by the public "please save us from the Muslims", when the Muslims **in truth** are just reacting over the millions that have been killed by the West in the last decade. Please tell me how great you would be feeling if your family was blown to bits. And the solution?? Paris rushes themselves further into the NWO by allowing more funds and persons to support (knowingly and unknowingly) the NWO.
Now, multiply this "false threat" over the world.........and soon the world believes they have to protect themselves against the Muslims, when in REALITY the NWO just wants to blow more of them up and domesticate them to BIBLICAL LEVELS The more I think about this, the more it seems to be a false flag from Western interests. This is a work around in response to Putin's taking the game away from the cia by bombing ISIS targets. They are switching gears now to have an excuse to intervene in Syria. Hollande's declaring it is "an act of war" makes things clear as to what their plans are. Damn, they want Assad out of there so bad now, they can taste it. Lets watch this unfold!
The invasion of male 'refugees' into Western Europe (Germany) provides perfect cover but that is a whole different kettle of fish. How that diaspora of the German state will dovetail down the line is anyone's guess. It's hard to believe that the Germans have not yet taken to the streets in large numbers. Sweden as we know, is now the rape capital of the West. The French people will want action of some sort after this. If the government doesn't respond, then the people on the streets will. Could quite easily be the trigger for major civil unrest spreading throughout Europe.
According to Simon Parkes in a recent interview, the Pope at the UN was the kick-off in earnest of the NWO. It seems to be panning out that way. This is like the Albert Pike prediction of WWIII with the forces of the West (Christianity) versus Islam leading to a complete breakdown of society in the End Game. And if you don't know who Albert Pike is and don't know what he predicted in 1871 i suggest you read this link http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm
The thing I can't quite see is if A) You're just trying to get a reaction or, B) You are seriously un-hinged.
Did you get rid of all the voices in your head? Do you now miss them and the things that they said?
Joined: Jan 15 2007 Posts: 11924 Location: Secret Hill Top Lair. V.2
Are you a part of this Illuminati?
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.
Your whole condescending argument is based on the words Zionism, fascism and Nazism not being evident in Pikes Era.
Nazism- first appearred in the mid 1800's but became more mainstream in 1920 when NSDAP merged withthe Volshich movement see hear Five key points -
1. Though Nazism claimed to be a new movement, many of its core ideas had deeper roots in German history, particularly the nationalism, authoritarianism and militarism of the 1800s.
2. Germany was itself a comparatively new nation, created through the unification of 26 different kingdoms in 1871. This unification was the product of strong nationalism and decisive military victories.
3. The Prussian kings and Junker elites who ruled imperial Germany in the late 19th century were conservative, authoritarian and militaristic, but also progressive with many of their policies.
4. The security and prosperity of late 19th century Germany made many Germans nostalgic for authoritarian government, something the Nazi movement was able to tap into in the early 1930s.
5. Another repository of traditional values and German ethnic nationalism was the grass-roots volkisch movement. Many members of volkisch groups later joined the NSDAP. - See more at: http://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/the ... lXHEE.dpuf
WIKIPEDIA: Prehistory of National Socialism 1834 the term "Nationalsozialismus" last appears in Print: Börsenblatt für den deutschen Buchhandel, page 36 1870 the term "National Socialism" first appears in English: "The sects of the Russian Church", The North British review, Volumes 52-53. 1884 "National Socialism", mentioned in "Fabian Tracts", Fabian Publications, Great Britain. 1896 The Czech National Social Party is formed. 1897 Franko Stein moves a small periodical Der Hammer from Vienna to Eger. May 1898 Maurice Barrès, while standing as a nationalist candidate for Nancy, France, coins the term "Socialist Nationalism". 1898 German Workers Congress organized by Stein in Eger (Cheb). Apr 1902 Organization of Nationalistic Labor took place in Saaz. Nov 15, 1903 Deutsche Arbeiterpartei in Österreich formed. (DAP) 1904 Hans Knirsch proposes to add "National Socialist" to the Austrian DAP name; rejected by party congress confrees. 1909 "All-Austrian" congress of the German Workers’ Party held in Prague. NATIONAL SOCIALISM EXISTED SINCE 1834, .
Even if the letter was hoaxed which it clearly isn't, it's accuracy in predicting the current world situation pre-WWIII is spot-on. So if it isn't authentic why is it so perfectly prophetic?
Your obviously clutching at straws. You'd have a lot more credibility if you could at least string more than a sentence to the thread, rather than mud sling unresearched drivel.
Good copy and paste, baa.
FLAT STANLEY wrote:Nice try but your wrong.
Your whole condescending argument is based on the words Zionism, fascism and Nazism not being evident in Pikes Era.
Nazism- first appearred in the mid 1800's but became more mainstream in 1920 when NSDAP merged withthe Volshich movement see hear Five key points -
1. Though Nazism claimed to be a new movement, many of its core ideas had deeper roots in German history, particularly the nationalism, authoritarianism and militarism of the 1800s.
2. Germany was itself a comparatively new nation, created through the unification of 26 different kingdoms in 1871. This unification was the product of strong nationalism and decisive military victories.
3. The Prussian kings and Junker elites who ruled imperial Germany in the late 19th century were conservative, authoritarian and militaristic, but also progressive with many of their policies.
4. The security and prosperity of late 19th century Germany made many Germans nostalgic for authoritarian government, something the Nazi movement was able to tap into in the early 1930s.
5. Another repository of traditional values and German ethnic nationalism was the grass-roots volkisch movement. Many members of volkisch groups later joined the NSDAP. - See more at: http://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/the ... lXHEE.dpuf
WIKIPEDIA: Prehistory of National Socialism 1834 the term "Nationalsozialismus" last appears in Print: Börsenblatt für den deutschen Buchhandel, page 36 1870 the term "National Socialism" first appears in English: "The sects of the Russian Church", The North British review, Volumes 52-53. 1884 "National Socialism", mentioned in "Fabian Tracts", Fabian Publications, Great Britain. 1896 The Czech National Social Party is formed. 1897 Franko Stein moves a small periodical Der Hammer from Vienna to Eger. May 1898 Maurice Barrès, while standing as a nationalist candidate for Nancy, France, coins the term "Socialist Nationalism". 1898 German Workers Congress organized by Stein in Eger (Cheb). Apr 1902 Organization of Nationalistic Labor took place in Saaz. Nov 15, 1903 Deutsche Arbeiterpartei in Österreich formed. (DAP) 1904 Hans Knirsch proposes to add "National Socialist" to the Austrian DAP name; rejected by party congress confrees. 1909 "All-Austrian" congress of the German Workers’ Party held in Prague. NATIONAL SOCIALISM EXISTED SINCE 1834, .
Even if the letter was hoaxed which it clearly isn't, it's accuracy in predicting the current world situation pre-WWIII is spot-on. So if it isn't authentic why is it so perfectly prophetic?
Your obviously clutching at straws. You'd have a lot more credibility if you could at least string more than a sentence to the thread, rather than mud sling unresearched drivel.
Good copy and paste, baa.
Tarquin Fuego wrote: I love Jamie and have done since he was 10 years old.
The Reason wrote:Hi Andy
The Rugby Football League are in the process of reviewing the video that you are referring to. We do not condone behaviour of this nature and have contacted the player’s employer, Hull F.C., who have confirmed that they are dealing with the incident under their club rules.
Hey Stanley, I have another conspiracy theory for you. The terrorist attacks on Paris were part of an RFU plot to deny RL any media coverage in the event of us beating the Kiwis.
This is just as plausible as the BS you have been posting.
dr_feelgood wrote:Hey Stanley, I have another conspiracy theory for you. The terrorist attacks on Paris were part of an RFU plot to deny RL any media coverage in the event of us beating the Kiwis.
This is just as plausible as the BS you have been posting.
Rugby Union doesn't have that pulling power.
The FA, all masons, does. an hours time difference between Paris and London to confuse everyone. Coincidence? Think not.
Tarquin Fuego wrote: I love Jamie and have done since he was 10 years old.
The Reason wrote:Hi Andy
The Rugby Football League are in the process of reviewing the video that you are referring to. We do not condone behaviour of this nature and have contacted the player’s employer, Hull F.C., who have confirmed that they are dealing with the incident under their club rules.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
