chissitt wrote:You mean the one that was a couple of minutes from beating the big spending under achieving team and doing the double over them despite having nine players missing through injury from the team that hammered you only days earlier, how embarrassing is that for a club whose motto seems to be, we'll just throw more money at it.
If 26-16 is a hammering, I wonder what losing 0-80 against Warrington is called?
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 7735 Location: Here there and everywhere
chissitt wrote:You mean the one that was a couple of minutes from beating the big spending under achieving team and doing the double over them despite having nine players missing through injury from the team that hammered you only days earlier, how embarrassing is that for a club whose motto seems to be, we'll just throw more money at it.
Quite ironic for a club who's previous regime saw them spiral into debt due to throwing money around that they didnt have.
Oh, and I quote
"Sneyd gave Hull some breathing space with a drop-goal with 12 minutes remaining."
So, hardly a couple of minutes for your woeful outfit to cover a 2 score difference
ccs wrote:Winning 18-16 with 15 minutes to go and a last minute converted try was pretty close to championship rugby.
Jake the Peg wrote "No, it's the ones who were a couple of minutes from playing championship rugby next season". Being in front for the last 15 minutes of the match is hardly consistent with his statement.
Keiththered wrote:Jake the Peg wrote "No, it's the ones who were a couple of minutes from playing championship rugby next season". Being in front for the last 15 minutes of the match is hardly consistent with his statement.
Thanks for your input. No one is interested. As for the wakey fan telling us how great they are, come back in september and tell us how it's going
Jake the Peg wrote:Thanks for your input. No one is interested. As for the wakey fan telling us how great they are, come back in september and tell us how it's going
No ones telling anybody how great we were when clearly we were an embarrassment, with the money you spent on players you did not exactly set SL alight yourselves, at least when we won the first two games of the season we had a full squad to pick from, where as when we beat you we were down to the bare bones, how embarrassing is that when you can't even beat the whipping boys
chissitt wrote:No ones telling anybody how great we were when clearly we were an embarrassment, with the money you spent on players you did not exactly set SL alight yourselves, at least when we won the first two games of the season we had a full squad to pick from, where as when we beat you we were down to the bare bones, how embarrassing is that when you can't even beat the whipping boys
You had a two week rest over our 4 day turn around, a few fc fans expected us to lose that night, after all with all the ex fc players in that squad it was like a cup final for them
didnt you have the same benefit the year before v wigan and beat them too as they had 3 games in 8 days!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 88 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
