Stand-Offish wrote:There might be a place on the unmediated history thread for him.
Brain insult's. Gee Wiz you've contributed a plethora of facts and nformation to the debate.
In my lexicon, NASA stands for: Nazi And Space Actor. If you ever ensued to start poking around NASA the Apollo moon landings, a keen eye & open mind will bring you to the conclusion that it was a staged hoax. In fact the pure hard scientific evidence & analysis irrevocably reveals the fraud among many. Think about it, the greatest feat accomplished by man is an elaborate Hollywood production that cost the US taxpayer a cool 30 billion. Imagine what JC could create with that, it pisses me off more that NASA has built up a money-sucking colossus composed of lies, hoaxes and misinformation. The US taxpayer derives virtually no benefit from NASA'S existence & alleged scientific contributions derived by supposed explorations & experiments in space. Absent of any other sources to verify, we have had to prostate ourselves to the so-called "experts" despite irrefutable evidence that NASA's nothing more than an elaborate financial embezzler & pseudoscience peddler
Can't be bothered reading the overly long OP but if the Earth is flat (and I have no preference or preconceived idea) when people circumnavigate the world how do they do it? Go round the "ends" and underneath / over? If so, what do they see and why is it not different to everyday experience? If it is flat, why on a clear day can't I see the Eiffel Tower?
theearthisflat wrote:You are one thick programmed Borg. Can you not READ Properly. I wasn't insinuating Jetstream. I was explaining about the supposed 1000 mph globular spin you freak. If the globe was spinning at east to west, your supposed flight time would alter flying with and against the so called Earth's spin
Let's do an experiment. Do a standing jump, as high as you can.
Say you were in the air for 0.5 seconds. Using your logic, you'd 'travel' around 220m as you're moving with the globular spin and smash into one of your living room walls.
However, the atmosphere, rather than just the Earth's ground is moving too. Speed is relative. So a person looking up at a plane from the ground sees it travelling say 500mph, but a person walking up the aisle of the plane, is walking at a speed of 3mph relative to the plane, and therefore 503mph relative to the man on the ground for that short time. Relative to a stationary object outside of the Earth's atmosphere, the plane would be travelling at 1,500mph and the person walking at 1,503mph.
Cup Winners: 1914, 1982, 2005, 2016, 2017. Cup Runners-Up: 1908, 1909, 1910, 1922, 1923, 1959, 1960, 1980, 1983, 1985, 2008, 2013. League Champions: 1920, 1921, 1936, 1956, 1958, 1983. League Runners-Up: 1957, 1982, 1984, 2006.
Joined: Feb 18 2006 Posts: 18610 Location: Somewhere in Bonny Donny (Twinned with Krakatoa in 1883).
Don't start bringing relatives into the equation ... inbreeding is what is responsible for this strange behaviour in the first place. A trip to the seaside is enough to demonstrate that the earth is curved, not least because you can SEE it from left to right on the horizon. Also a boat sailing out to sea disappears bottom first, mast last. A boat on a level sea would just get smaller but with ALL parts visible until it was a dot. Seemples! Next!
All the boats I have ever observed could have been related to the Titanic, I suppose!
War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
Stand-Offish wrote:. A trip to the seaside is enough to demonstrate that the earth is curved, not least because you can SEE it from left to right on the horizon. :
Which seaside was you smoking CRACK.
Stand-Offish wrote:Also a boat sailing out to sea disappears bottom first, mast last. A boat on a level sea would just get smaller but with ALL parts visible until it was a dot.
[quote="Doom&Gloom Merchant . Speed is relative. .[/quote]
To what
I take it you've not seen the evidence in my previous post. If the earth is spinning at 1000 mph at the equator what speed are you rotating at the poles.?
If the earth is spinning west to east ( anti-clockwise ) at 1000 mph why has this Felix Baumgartner supposedly took 3 hours to reach his 120,000 feet jump and the last hour was in virtual vacuum, so we are led to believe. Now, his ascent with drift, took him 70 km away from where he first ascended from. So he's 1 hour in a virtual vacuum meaning that, going by a supposed rotating earth scenario, realistically, he should be off course by 1000 miles , minimum, not 70 km EAST yes EAST not west, now why would this be the case on a globe model ?
Also with Félix being in a complete vacuum for a solid hour we should of seen the globular spin below but we didn't, can't have it both ways. That magical THEORY gravity is relative to everything bollix.
You are visiting the padded cell in the farthest corner of the asylum. Nothing you say will get heard. If you have a mean disposition, all you can do is get a stick and poke the TRUTH's for entertainment.
Stand-Offish wrote:. A trip to the seaside is enough to demonstrate that the earth is curved, not least because you can SEE it from left to right on the horizon. :
Which seaside was you smoking CRACK.
Stand-Offish wrote:Also a boat sailing out to sea disappears bottom first, mast last. A boat on a level sea would just get smaller but with ALL parts visible until it was a dot.
[quote="Doom&Gloom Merchant . Speed is relative. .[/quote]
To what
I take it you've not seen the evidence in my previous post. If the earth is spinning at 1000 mph at the equator what speed are you rotating at the poles.?
If the earth is spinning west to east ( anti-clockwise ) at 1000 mph why has this Felix Baumgartner supposedly took 3 hours to reach his 120,000 feet jump and the last hour was in virtual vacuum, so we are led to believe. Now, his ascent with drift, took him 70 km away from where he first ascended from. So he's 1 hour in a virtual vacuum meaning that, going by a supposed rotating earth scenario, realistically, he should be off course by 1000 miles , minimum, not 70 km EAST yes EAST not west, now why would this be the case on a globe model ?
Also with Félix being in a complete vacuum for a solid hour we should of seen the globular spin below but we didn't, can't have it both ways. That magical THEORY gravity is relative to everything bollix.
You are visiting the padded cell in the farthest corner of the asylum. Nothing you say will get heard. If you have a mean disposition, all you can do is get a stick and poke the TRUTH's for entertainment.
In my lexicon, NASA stands for: Nazi And Space Actor. If you ever ensued to start poking around NASA the Apollo moon landings, a keen eye & open mind will bring you to the conclusion that it was a staged hoax. In fact the pure hard scientific evidence & analysis irrevocably reveals the fraud among many. Think about it, the greatest feat accomplished by man is an elaborate Hollywood production that cost the US taxpayer a cool 30 billion. Imagine what JC could create with that, it pisses me off more that NASA has built up a money-sucking colossus composed of lies, hoaxes and misinformation. The US taxpayer derives virtually no benefit from NASA'S existence & alleged scientific contributions derived by supposed explorations & experiments in space. Absent of any other sources to verify, we have had to prostate ourselves to the so-called "experts" despite irrefutable evidence that NASA's nothing more than an elaborate financial embezzler & pseudoscience peddler
Stand-Offish wrote:I can't believe our learned friend from Bradford has got sucked into this nonsense.
Ha ha hypocrite.
In my lexicon, NASA stands for: Nazi And Space Actor. If you ever ensued to start poking around NASA the Apollo moon landings, a keen eye & open mind will bring you to the conclusion that it was a staged hoax. In fact the pure hard scientific evidence & analysis irrevocably reveals the fraud among many. Think about it, the greatest feat accomplished by man is an elaborate Hollywood production that cost the US taxpayer a cool 30 billion. Imagine what JC could create with that, it pisses me off more that NASA has built up a money-sucking colossus composed of lies, hoaxes and misinformation. The US taxpayer derives virtually no benefit from NASA'S existence & alleged scientific contributions derived by supposed explorations & experiments in space. Absent of any other sources to verify, we have had to prostate ourselves to the so-called "experts" despite irrefutable evidence that NASA's nothing more than an elaborate financial embezzler & pseudoscience peddler
Joined: Feb 18 2006 Posts: 18610 Location: Somewhere in Bonny Donny (Twinned with Krakatoa in 1883).
theearthisflat wrote:Ha ha hypocrite.
You're humerous, I'll give you that. As for your line of argument and reasoning, I have to admit that you have converted me. I suppose I have been flattened.
It's revelations like this that adds interest to an otherwise boring world. I thank you for showing me the light and also the lengths that some nasty people will go to, to try to pull the wool over our eyes I'm a new man ... I feel alive for the first time, like some giant burden has been taken off my shoulders in pretending for all these years. Praise the lord! By the way, does he live in a flat?
War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
Ha ha another fool who loves cartoons and CGI composites.
In my lexicon, NASA stands for: Nazi And Space Actor. If you ever ensued to start poking around NASA the Apollo moon landings, a keen eye & open mind will bring you to the conclusion that it was a staged hoax. In fact the pure hard scientific evidence & analysis irrevocably reveals the fraud among many. Think about it, the greatest feat accomplished by man is an elaborate Hollywood production that cost the US taxpayer a cool 30 billion. Imagine what JC could create with that, it pisses me off more that NASA has built up a money-sucking colossus composed of lies, hoaxes and misinformation. The US taxpayer derives virtually no benefit from NASA'S existence & alleged scientific contributions derived by supposed explorations & experiments in space. Absent of any other sources to verify, we have had to prostate ourselves to the so-called "experts" despite irrefutable evidence that NASA's nothing more than an elaborate financial embezzler & pseudoscience peddler
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
