Wigg'n wrote:It'll be interesting to see him up against Taupau if he gets the chance. I can't see it ending well for Faz!
He'll do just fine. For me he's the best second row forward England have. Westwood has had his best years & Ferres doesn't have the same work ethic or ability. JJB falls into the same category as Westwood & Ablett the same as Ferres.
Rogues Gallery wrote:Who would you play in the second row then?
I think Bateman has done enough to get a go, and from the squad I'd go with Ferres. Incidentally, I wasn't saying that I would play him, I just think he'll struggle against the very physical Kiwi forwards.
Joined: Oct 14 2004 Posts: 12106 Location: The Middle of the Land
I expect Farrell will struggle at times with the size and power of the Kiwi pack. But then so will anybody else. Lots of NRL players struggle with it too.
We should pick him because he's a terrific player, and the best option for the position. On the flip side of the size problem, I think some of the kiwis might struggle with the footwork and turn of speed that he has. The acceleration for the opening try of the GF was superb.
I'd be very tempted to partner him with Bateman. I find both of them quite hard to like (because they're niggly b*st*rds, and like everyone else, I only like niggly b*st*rds when they play for my own team). But they're not paid to be liked. They're paid to get the job done and I think they've both been excellent every time I've seen them this year.
We also, I recall, had this debate before the 4 nations last year. I too thought he'd be too small. I revised that view after watching the matches. He never looked like he wouldn't cope physically.
He should play against the kiwis. Simple as that, IMO. Pick the best players.
Personally I'd pick the criminally under-rated Ablett in there somewhere too. But that's the trouble with being criminally under-rated. C'est la vie.
On the original topic, his reaction to the two McGuire tries did him no favours. But again, he isn't paid to be likeable. He didn't deserve to be on the losing side, but then out of two squads of 17 I didn't think anyone, except Tony Clubb's aberrant last few minutes, played badly.
Dan_74_Rhino wrote:I think Bateman has done enough to get a go, and from the squad I'd go with Ferres. Incidentally, I wasn't saying that I would play him, I just think he'll struggle against the very physical Kiwi forwards.
Farell is bigger than Bateman
SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS
For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.
For 27 - 0 you get a trophy For 75 - 0 you get sod all.
Wigan had eight in a row Saints have five in a row
jinkin jimmy wrote:I seriously doubt there's much in them but, to me, Bateman is bigger. Not that it matters, of course.
I don't think so. We commented on Saturday when they were walking back together for about the fourth time after a try had been scored. Bateman maybe slightly taller but I reckon Farrell has the bigger build.
SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS
For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.
For 27 - 0 you get a trophy For 75 - 0 you get sod all.
Wigan had eight in a row Saints have five in a row
Frank Zappa wrote:Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.
The_Enforcer wrote:Most idiotic post ever goes to Grimmy..... The way to restart should be an arm wrestle between a designated player from each side.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum