if its true,its a shame the players didn't veto the resigning of yeaman.

Might be a moot point now, but Michaels would need sponsorship from the new employer and then applies to transfer his visa. Same applies to Carney. Allegations of potentially criminal behaviour aren't considered as part of the visa process so there should be no problem for Michaels to move if that was what's happening.

If he stays here, we issue new sponsorship and extend the visa.

Maybe we might sign what we need - a hooker?

Maybe we could sign an outside back and a hooker (both of which we need) if we weren't overloaded with back row forwards.

Any ideas which good hookers are available?

This, the club don't need a spin doctor, the gullible fans do a good job for them.

Players voting on signing players, what absolute nonsense, oh but it's a one off because of the circumstances, give your heads a shake ffs!
It's so easy to create rumours and they become 'facts', seems most fans here can't wait to lap it up.

^This guy

So what part of the rumours actually have any semblance of facts about them, any of it?
Everything, has been a rumour, all of it, the club can say whatever they like to suit an agenda, so called events are 'accidentally' let slip to someone they know will start the rumour mill within a matter of hours it's taken as gospel, this includes HDM representatives.
At present we aren't signing anyone, least of all Carney and if Micheals has these 'rumoured' visa issues who the hell would want to take him, why would Cas want him.
But yeah, well done D&GM on your counter argument to prove your point.

Why are you so angry?

a strike centre first