cod'ead wrote:So you use selective passages from three different publications, cobble them together and come up with your usual bullshit.
That's the sort of trick a 13 year-old would try to pull with his homework and he'd be pulled up for it too
Wrong as usual. The three reports I read had exactly the same story as I reported.
So I repeat my questions which you have avoided answering ie: which part(s) of the story were/are you unaware of and were or still are challenging and which do you consider to be bullsh1t?
1. That Varoufakis had a covert Plan B to use a secret parallel banking system to raid central bank reserves by hacking into the tax system accounts and restore the drachma?
2. That the supreme court has referred the case to parliament to vote on whether he should lose his immunity from prosecution
3. That all those implicated face criminal charges and that Varoufakis could also face charges of high treason and breach of duty
Why is it that one eyed lefties so quickly use an insult when they are unable to form a sensible argument?
