Marcus's Bicycle wrote:When interviewed before the Wigan game AP disclosed that 2 outside backs have been signed and he is looking for another backrower. I think another Hooker should be a priority signing, Houghton rarely gets injured but we can't always rely on that. Maybe the backrower is Washbrook who has been signed as cover at hooker. He could also do a job at stand off....

the artist wrote:yeah i think its imperative that we go into next season with a decent back up hooker and not just a utility man thrust into the position. Having got rid of all our back ups this season we need to sign decent cover. Houghton is simply being asked to do too much

Dave K. wrote:I really like the look if Jez Litten, but he has only just turned 17, should have kept Cunningham, but what do you do when Houghton if fit, he can't get a game.

Think that's the big issue, if we sign a hooker, he won't play unless Houghton is injured.

We were never in for Mcshane, our back up hooker is already signed.

*1865* wrote:But who? When McShane is rejecting us for Cas, you know you've got problems!

deslawson wrote:Mcshane said he didn't want to take a backward step at this stage of his career.

Jake the Peg wrote:Do you blame him?

Dave K. wrote:From Wakey?

They are in the little league now with the other small teams.