You mean a player like Anthony Gelling, at the time a 21 year old with roughly 0 first grade games?

Sarginson & gelling no Wigan only sign proven players.

Yet more superfluous BS.

Think people need to understand what it is i'm saying. I'm saying that, in this instance, i'd rather we gave Logan the chance than a reject NRL. Yes i'm quite aware that the odd NRL 'reject' has turned out to be decent. But for every Sam Moa, there's 4 or 5 Brett Seymour's.

Some people (luckily nobody at the club) also seem to be talking about him moving to 6 when Pryce retires! Well, again i'd rather HTW be given that chance alongside Sneyd, who by then will have had 2 years at the club and will be in a position of experience to help someone like HTW settle in.

We also have Abdull, who at the moment should be kept mainly in the halves with the odd bit of game time at LF. Giving him the 13 shirt would be silly, the pack is far more demanding and he doesn't possess great fitness & stamina, yet!

Sarginson had played 50 SL games!

Gelling is fair enough, of course there's instances of it working out. But like i've just said - for every Sam Moa there's 4 or 5 Seymour's or Hutch Maiava's.

Well that's not what I said at all, is it?

You mean the young lad who's Motu's mate?

Can't call playing for London a game, my nanna would have got a game for them but she goes to bingo on a Sunday, Seymour wrecked himself. He played a good level before coming here.

Great debating.

Same as frank eh? But suppose turgut or brad fash are better already.
Your making yourself look daft pal. The 19s & SL are a different level.

But a lot of players got played in that London team what shouldn't have been played but they had no choice yet to sling their youth in & look how that ended.